Search results

Another good example!

And the funny thing is the World Court, which forced this case (since there mandate is to take only disputes that both sides agree to bring, and Israel did not agree here), is supposed to be an fair and impartial "COURT." Yet, before the case even began, the Arab members who help to judge began...

Thos who assassinate, rather than "capture and bring to trial, are the wild eyed crazies," But those who seek to kill any and all civilians possible, and who refuse all negotiation (even when offered something beyond fair), are simply a "group that sees no reasonable alternative." Do you even...

The terrorists who flew the plane were looking to kill tens of thousands of "infidels." They weren't trying to avoid civilians, they were looking to kill anyone and everyone they could who didn't see things exactly the way they did, with no tolerance for any other views. Big difference from...

How is that? Many insurgencies and terrorist groups have been put down. They are doing a good job of it in the Philippines, Fujimora virtually eliminated the Shining Path (who now, without a tough president to challenge them, are making a minor comeback), and Colombia is making progress against...

First of all, they can hate Israel and still the people can be jeaolous the more they see of a free and open society, and eventually most people will want the same. Secondly, Israel has some allies, some more friendly than others, including India, Turkey, Qater and of course a tense alliance...

Except that in this case, the majority of this "influence" for Israel actually comes from Christians, from Evangelicals who support it for spiritual reasons, to the multitudes who see the importance of democratic, open allies in the Middle East.

If they existed against absolutely amazing odds in the beginning without US help, then yes, today they would be. And this is doubly true if US helped stop today, after the help Israel has already gotten, even though Egypt gets almost as much.

So true!

Especially when the "occupiers" only become such because of being attacked, and these occupiers tried to give everything back in return for peace (after the Egyptians wouldn't accept Gaza being given back to them, cause they didn't want to deal with such a radicalized population).

No, but you can create obstacles for these terrorists!

Actually not true. The US did nothing for Israel during the first war, and the US helped arm Israel's enemies later on just as much as they helped Israel.

Judging from his history, saddam probably would've killed more people than have been killed in Iraq as they start getting a taste of freedom. As far as Afghanistan, where people were living (and many were starving or being executed) under a terrible, brutal regime, there were relatively few...

His comments of what bin Laden would do with nuclear and chemical weapons is not hypothesis, is based both upon what bin Laden has said he would do and on his past actions. Stupid polls and comments like these that are supposed to pass for critical thinking are why I almost never visit the chit...

Actually Freddie, if you have any brains you would notice that there are only a few of us left in this discussion. The few of us hardly represent the entirety of this thread. And I didn't imply a "majority," but rather that it has been, until this afternoon, pretty even. You were stating, at a...

Welcome back. The point is that the UN, which in investigating Jenin (a case where nothing was going on, compared to the numerous terrible tragedies that have happened around the world that the UN has not bothered to investigate or doing anything about) was probably hoping to find something...

Maybe it is accurate (and maybe not), its not like I have time to buy and read and then research this book this afternoon. But the fact that the guy is Jewish in itself proves little to nothing (usually nothing). If its accurate, and again I say IF, then as I said before it is sad. No group of...

Israel did not agree to a cease fire, Hamas was not abiding by their unilateral cease fire, and the only reason it offered one was to buy time to rebuild its stocks of weapons and make new terror plans. As far as the article, I can hardly address the accusations of an author that are...

COMPLETELY, ABSOLUTELY the opposite. This is the ultimate twisting. If you're referring to the assassination of terrorists, you are twisting so much its absolutely pathetic. Hamas called a UNILATERAL cease fire, yet terrorist bombings were still going on. They only called a cease fire to try to...

That is one dirty bunch! :cool: .......ok, I won't try anymore puns!