Search results

In that case, the market maker is the buyer on the other side of the print. M

Wouldn't they have to be both buys and sells in order for there to be a trade printed? M

What's so funny is that any bias in the wheel shows up as a positive correlation, not a negative one. That means if the wheel is biased (even slightly), you're actually better off betting on the SAME result occurring again, not the opposite result. Note that if the wheel is unbiased neither...

Just as you must be a born speller? :D M

Nope. You is the only one. M

Couldn't disagree more. I believe there is a strongly negative correlation. M

Perhaps it echoes from another cavernous region? :D You haven't presented any research. All you've done is make claims that you can't substantiate. Big deal. None of us do. M

You have yet to substantiate anything, instead choosing to speak entirely from underneath yourself. M

Could one say that they're betting on a trend in the spread? M

The burden of proof is on you, not me. You made an assertion, I called you on it, and now it's up to you to back up your assertion with facts. I'll be very interested to hear your evidence that the 50/200 DMA Crossover system is overfit. M

You're joking, right? The 50/200 dma crossover has been around forever. M

This is one of those very special things that seems to mainly happen on the internet and always gives me a good laugh... :D M

No free lunch for you, buddy. Do your own work! M

You do understand that one of the most difficult, critical, and sensitive steps in any mathematical endeavor is getting the definitions right, don't you? M

I have made no assertions (and therefore am under no burden to provide proof of anything), do my own work, draw my own conclusions, and feel no desire to share the fruits of my labor freely here. M

Sequence of FACTS (as opposed to your theories or opinions) that, when assembled in the proper order using valid logical statements, evaluate to the following: Your claim = true M

You didn't prove anything. All you did was continue making assertions. Prove something and we'll talk. M

That would be something called a theory, not a proof. Prove your assertions. M

Prove it. M

No, you're looking for someone to hand you a system. We've caught on, and it ain't gonna happen. M