Search results

Wait, this thread was trying to claim credit for Bush for "protecting the border." Never mind, you've been known to have trouble with logic...

Looks like we're talking to a real retard here. From wikipedia

Yes, give him credit - more Americans died in Iraq than on 9/11. Do you get credit for not screwing up again after one major screwup? Read Bob Woodward's "State of Denial." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/29/AR2006092901593.html

And Hastert sat on this info for almost a year and did nothing? Talk about "do-nothing" congress! http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/09/house-gop-leadership-knew-about-foley.html

It's so much fun watching the "family values" gang defending a pedophile... Not only he doesn't know the difference between a homosexual and a pedophile. He also doesn't know that "internet sex" with a minor is a federal felony (thanks in part to Rep. Foley). Yes, on the internet, "lewd" is...

Do Republican Congressmen use bookmarks? No, they prefer to bend the page over. Alternative answer: No, they stick their fingers in the pages.

This is really pathetic. So you're not outraged that Hastert sat on the case for a whole year, but outraged when Pelosi demanded an investigation? By the way, Pelosi's resolution (for an ethics investigation) passed the house 420 to ZERO! I'll bet if you were a house member you would be the lone...

Let's see ... The Republicans typically run on "family values," "moral values," and other such "values." They usually attack Democrats as not having morality, anti-family, and unGod. This particular Republican was running around telling everyone how pornography was bad for children, how he...

Dems "would defend" a pedophile? Did you watch too much Fox?

You'd be surprised that if he was really trying to demonize the whole party (which I don't agree), he may even have a leg to stand on: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/09/29/national/w123452D40.DTL&type=politics "Alexander said the boy notified a staffer in his office...

FYI, there is a difference between a homosexual and a pervert (as in pedophile).

Attack the messenger, not the message? I don't know who the article was intended. This is a website of a Jesuit university. The article was published in a Jesuit journal. I know Jesuits are liberals. But do you think that they would intentionally attack Christian beliefs? For the glory of God?

Good, finally something that makes sense. No need to deny the correlation, as you were trying to do. People are free to draw their own conclusions from such correlation. Like I said,

Drawing conclusions based on observation. As scientific as it can be, given the circumstances.

If you look at the horizontal axes of all the figures, you see captions like "Absolutely believe in God," "Take Bible literally," "Attend religious services at least several times a month," "Pray at least several times a month," and "agnostics and atheists." When there is correlation, very...

What speech?

Idiot. There is a difference between the definition of a word (planet) or a quantity (meter, for example), and the description of a natural phenomenon. Changing the definition of a scientific concept happened numerous times in history. The standard of "meter" was changed at least three...

Obviously you didn't read the article he quoted. It was not simply comparing social ills in each country. It showed a strong correlation between religious beliefs and social ills. For example, if you plot the number of teenage abortions as a function of percentage of population who go to...

Try to tell that to the Japanese. This is quoted from wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_Massacre