Search results

The real parting shots by this guy are here: http://www.redstate.com/blogs/thomas/2007/dec/31/and_the_horses_you_all_rode_in_on_one_at_a_time_then_rotate And he certainly did not hold punches: To 9iu11ani: Now, your personal life is, let's put this delicately, FUBAR; but your decision not...

One of the founders of Redstate and its current director, is calling it quits. http://www.redstate.com/blogs/thomas/2007/dec/31/just_a_drop_of_water_in_an_endless_sea On the parting shot at the current Republican presidential field, he certainly did not mince words: First: I have withheld...

This is so wrong. Here is the preamble of the UN declaration of human rights: Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, Whereas disregard...

If the latter doesn't involve learning, then I would call it poor planning. Either way, it's imperfect.

Not a very good practice. Do you have a reason to rewrite your codes? If you do, was that reason known before you wrote the previous version? If not, then you are learning.

This I agree with. In fact, I think all his "no" votes in congress should be lauded for the stand that he is taking. But he is not someone you want to be in the Whitehouse.

You're right. I got him mixed up with past prime (yeah, all conservatives look alike ;-)) Here is hapaboy's statement regarding Hitler: So there is a difference, even though when it comes to Muslims, he is just as blood thirsty as Ann Coulter.

Because they were NOT packaged with things that RP was opposed to. Please RTFP! 1. He called for dismantling of environmental laws. Nobody packaged this for him. He called for it and it's nuts! 2. He voted against Rosa Parks medal. Again it was just one thing, no attachments and was passed...

If you know hapaboy, you wouldn't ask these questions. His hero is Hitler.

So God is learning. How wonderful! Do you suppose that God has finished learning and we are his final product, or is He still making mistakes and we will ultimately be exterminated like all failed products before us?

Out of the 5 things I listed, only the last one, the vote against welfare reform, could have been a package that contained other things Ron Paul opposed to. The border security amendment was brought up in congress 4 separate times by Republicans, Ron Paul voted against it every single time. It...

1. Called for a complete dismantling of all environmental laws. 2. Voted against Rosa Parks Medal (single no vote in congress, popular anyone?) 3. Voted against border security (4 times in past 6 years). And called for generosity for illegal immigrants. 4. Voted against line-item veto...

Most but not all of his positions. The ones that are not popular, common sense positions are the ones define him as a nut case.

So Ron Paul is a nut case. What else is there to discuss?

1 One Uno 一 100% It is the same statistical chance that tomorrow will be different than today, in any manner.

No, secession was the ultimatum for war. If the south had stayed in the union, then perhaps a political compromise could have been reached whereby some compensation for the slave owners could have been formulated. Instead, they chose to fight for the preservation of the slavery. That choice made...

One guy claims to be Jesus, the other claims to have a direct line to Jesus. We don't know who to believe unless one of you guys demonstrates a miracle. Come on guys!

I find this kind of revisionist history (of yours and Dr. Paul's) dishonest at least. Who started the civil war? When the southern states seceded, what was Lincoln as the president of the USA to do? I suppose both you and Dr. Paul also agree then, that the civil war was in fact the war of...

So in your opinion, that footage Fox showed, where Ron Paul attacked Lincoln, and made the claim that the civil war was "unnecessary" to free the slaves, was not a smear, but reporting facts. Ok. Based on these facts, one must conclude that Ron Paul is a racist and a bigot.

No. I usually believe that an article is written by the person whose name appears on the article as the author. To allow one's own name to be used on articles he/she didn't write in academic world is usually cause for disciplinary actions - it is definitely unethical. There was no evidence...