Search results

  1. J

    A sign of the collapsing conservative movement?

    The real parting shots by this guy are here: http://www.redstate.com/blogs/thomas/2007/dec/31/and_the_horses_you_all_rode_in_on_one_at_a_time_then_rotate And he certainly did not hold punches: To 9iu11ani: Now, your personal life is, let's put this delicately, FUBAR; but your decision not...
  2. J

    A sign of the collapsing conservative movement?

    One of the founders of Redstate and its current director, is calling it quits. http://www.redstate.com/blogs/thomas/2007/dec/31/just_a_drop_of_water_in_an_endless_sea On the parting shot at the current Republican presidential field, he certainly did not mince words: First: I have withheld...
  3. J

    Bhutto murdered in Pakistan.

    This is so wrong. Here is the preamble of the UN declaration of human rights: Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, Whereas disregard...
  4. J

    Intelligent design and extinctions

    If the latter doesn't involve learning, then I would call it poor planning. Either way, it's imperfect.
  5. J

    Intelligent design and extinctions

    Not a very good practice. Do you have a reason to rewrite your codes? If you do, was that reason known before you wrote the previous version? If not, then you are learning.
  6. J

    Ron Paul Rejects Evolution

    This I agree with. In fact, I think all his "no" votes in congress should be lauded for the stand that he is taking. But he is not someone you want to be in the Whitehouse.
  7. J

    Bhutto murdered in Pakistan.

    You're right. I got him mixed up with past prime (yeah, all conservatives look alike ;-)) Here is hapaboy's statement regarding Hitler: So there is a difference, even though when it comes to Muslims, he is just as blood thirsty as Ann Coulter.
  8. J

    Ron Paul Rejects Evolution

    Because they were NOT packaged with things that RP was opposed to. Please RTFP! 1. He called for dismantling of environmental laws. Nobody packaged this for him. He called for it and it's nuts! 2. He voted against Rosa Parks medal. Again it was just one thing, no attachments and was passed...
  9. J

    Bhutto murdered in Pakistan.

    If you know hapaboy, you wouldn't ask these questions. His hero is Hitler.
  10. J

    Intelligent design and extinctions

    So God is learning. How wonderful! Do you suppose that God has finished learning and we are his final product, or is He still making mistakes and we will ultimately be exterminated like all failed products before us?
  11. J

    Ron Paul Rejects Evolution

    Out of the 5 things I listed, only the last one, the vote against welfare reform, could have been a package that contained other things Ron Paul opposed to. The border security amendment was brought up in congress 4 separate times by Republicans, Ron Paul voted against it every single time. It...
  12. J

    Ron Paul Rejects Evolution

    1. Called for a complete dismantling of all environmental laws. 2. Voted against Rosa Parks Medal (single no vote in congress, popular anyone?) 3. Voted against border security (4 times in past 6 years). And called for generosity for illegal immigrants. 4. Voted against line-item veto...
  13. J

    Ron Paul Rejects Evolution

    Most but not all of his positions. The ones that are not popular, common sense positions are the ones define him as a nut case.
  14. J

    Ron Paul Rejects Evolution

    So Ron Paul is a nut case. What else is there to discuss?
  15. J

    Intelligent design and extinctions

    1 One Uno 一 100% It is the same statistical chance that tomorrow will be different than today, in any manner.
  16. J

    The New York Times retracted its smear of Ron Paul

    No, secession was the ultimatum for war. If the south had stayed in the union, then perhaps a political compromise could have been reached whereby some compensation for the slave owners could have been formulated. Instead, they chose to fight for the preservation of the slavery. That choice made...
  17. J

    How do you determine existence?

    One guy claims to be Jesus, the other claims to have a direct line to Jesus. We don't know who to believe unless one of you guys demonstrates a miracle. Come on guys!
  18. J

    The New York Times retracted its smear of Ron Paul

    I find this kind of revisionist history (of yours and Dr. Paul's) dishonest at least. Who started the civil war? When the southern states seceded, what was Lincoln as the president of the USA to do? I suppose both you and Dr. Paul also agree then, that the civil war was in fact the war of...
  19. J

    The New York Times retracted its smear of Ron Paul

    So in your opinion, that footage Fox showed, where Ron Paul attacked Lincoln, and made the claim that the civil war was "unnecessary" to free the slaves, was not a smear, but reporting facts. Ok. Based on these facts, one must conclude that Ron Paul is a racist and a bigot.
  20. J

    The New York Times retracted its smear of Ron Paul

    No. I usually believe that an article is written by the person whose name appears on the article as the author. To allow one's own name to be used on articles he/she didn't write in academic world is usually cause for disciplinary actions - it is definitely unethical. There was no evidence...
Back
Top