Search results

This provides clarity to me at the moment, although I can't express it correctly yet. I will build a serie of snippets trying to incorporate the alpha preconditions as you said, and solve other issues as for some EE's, hoping it will lead me to further DDs and maybe, to understand the case I...

Maybe the solution is to understand the A-band "COMES". Just like tiddly who said there is to be clear with the T2P present in the trend. When T2P comes, it's an A-band pass. In other words, the level of next bar is inside the A-band boundaries. Or it can hvbo, or it can be lvbo. I need to stay...

I see this fuzzy, and contradictory. Why so ? - When does A-band become active ? -> when P2 is there. - in the OOE, where is P2 ? -> in third position - what does come before ? -> the second and first element. - which are they ? -> T1 and P1. - So, when we are at P2, we've had P1-T1-P2. These...

That's how I'd see what you say here. I'm studying the post the quoted is from, and it's greatly hard and deep. Love it, although it's really hard. I feel a bit overwhelmed at the moment, maybe a break should be welcome. I don't know what I could do now, I don't know what to go/start with...

+ Thre is ambiguity here. It reminds me when I was working through the PP1 EE. I had said being as we're in an acceleration concept AND we have 3 P1's, the acceleration could only appear by comparing (P1.1-P1.2) and (P1.0-P1.1). So the acceleration would be that the difference between last two...

This is not complete and unsatisfying and maybe partly wrong

Anyway, there is something here that echoes to something that has always disturbed me : Aa need the four bar context. So until T2P. If T2P is there, B-band is active. So A-band is killed. From memory : the major clue to getting it with EEs is to know which band is in effect to know wich EE can...

Yes, but to get Af we need P2<P1 AND the HVBO must occur in the Lat AND the trend must have progressed only until P2 included. When I began to work deep into the A-band EE's, I thought Aa needed a Lat to be there AND T2P to be there and a non retro keeping one INT PC = wait intact, to have its...

All the following is at first sight, whithout further reasoning. First : here, we are to be sure about the text. We've clearly exposed some texts talk about " a four bar" and others "a four bar LATERAL". The second way of saying the thing makes thing more than anything to Lat1 until Lat4. A...

Just reread thos posts, ang beginning to study your post.

It surprises me I can sometimes be so coarse...

Oooooow...... So I had not added that "lateral" word for nothing in my writings... I had really read it and it did not come out from anywhere.

Zone 1 : my bad, you're right. Thank you. So I'd see now Fb EE. Yes F context needs to wait for T2F...but lastly I learned the four bar context can be considered established pragmatically even though T2P is not yet here. This led to have an Aa EE whithout having T2P present in the trend. If...

I need this : Let's say each price bar related to each volume bar is included into the same trend AND each pC allows to measure volume. Bar 1 : P1 is ass Bar 2 : Vol is DEC so T1 Bar 3 : Vol is INC AND below P1 so P2. A-band passes and is active now. Bar 4 : Vol is DEC AND is above T1 : so...

Up to current sticking point Lunch time

No. Now, better.

Maybe better now

Thank you for your patience

Little issue spotted by the red flag : bar 33, 13:40. Bar 26 : BMrev, P1 ass. Bar 27 : XB degapped, vol DEC so T1, rtl is established Bar 28 : XR degapped, vol DEC so T1 repeats. Bar 29 : XB degapped, vol INC so P2. Bar 30 : XR, vol DEC between P2 and leftmost T1 : T2P. L of bar is below last...

At first, when I was not finding a n EE in the MT, I was thinking I had missed the ID of the EE. Then I observed the MT and noticed there were times when it was possible to have a n EE, and in the next EE, this n EE becoming the new n-1 was not present. I had DDd in my mind that the absence of n...