Search results

in the current volatility environment, there is no way you can usually get 60-80 YM points in the opening minutes most days it takes HOURS to move directionally that # of points

yes. i was referring to the anti-aging clinics, in regards to prescriptions. i also agree about the long isomer of IGF-1

yes i look at trading as having four elements (for the discretionary trader) 1) emotional. arguably the most important. you are your own worst enemy. your emotions (fear, hope, greed, euphoria, panic) will work against you. that's how the market is designed, as a dynamic feedback system...

imo, supplements are just like art, movies, books, food, etc. 90% are mediocre at best 5% are excellent 5% are bad for you there are lots of very effective supplements : R-ala, creatine, fish oil, protein powder, acetyl-l-carnitine, melatonin, peptide bonded glutamine, fish oil...

i discuss general concepts with the general public i would NEVER reveal a profitable strategy to anybody but a paying client

you can't force the market to conform to your trading style if low volatility market does not suit your trading style - find another market or learn how to trade this kind of market frankly, i find low volatility eminently tradeable

i used to be a competitive 5k runner. i have also competed in weightlifting and powerlifting not currently doing any contests

also, IB does chunk data if it comes too fast. this is not necessarily bad because most other datafeeds will LAG because they are trying to compile each individual fill and the market moves too fast . in this respect, imo, IB is actually superior. like if u are trading FOMC (although today was...

that is correct. down to the 30 second level (on backfill , which is what we are discussing here), IB data is about as clean as most other vendors. also, it is dependant on whether you are filtering or not your backfill which can account for why SEVERAL datafeeds had that spike downwards and...

and of course it also depends on goals. depending on goals, a trainer might be more inclined to use one methodology over another, but the basics are the basics. for example, there are no strength/explosive/sports that athletes cannot benefit from power cleans. there are few better ways to...

the point is that i made a grammatical error by saying he "lives" for it, which is a tense error since he is dead don't infer. as for poliquin. i have been a fan of poliquin for years, as well as Dr. Squat Fred Hatfield. it's pretty good stuff. weight training falls under (i believe...

or more correctly - "mentzer LIVEd for it" he's dead

well, not it's definitely different from mentzer "heavy dooooty" stuff olers almost NEVER work to failure. mentzer lives for it mentzer is about "high intensity" (he defines that as working to the point of perceived muscular failure) and infrequent workouts ol'ers trade VERY...

"My chest and arms got more definition than using free weights" - there is no exercise that gives your muscles more definition definition is created by 1) genetics 2) low bodyfat 3) low subcutaneous water but individual muscle fibers can only get bigger or smaller. period this...

yes. even though i have short arms (relative to my legs), i like to deadlift the only problem with deadlifting is that it is a very different movement pattern than the clean pull, and you have to be careful not to start "deadlifting your cleans" in deadlifting, among other distinctions...

i workout. mainly i do the sport of weightlifting (snatch, clean and jerk), but have also dabbled in powerlifting.

thanks for the props, guys. by the way- of course game theory is applied mathematics. so is playing poker. ask chris ferguson so is trading (at least for me it is) one of the guys i learned from trades almost SOLELY from watching the tape and listening to pit noise. clearly, he can...

look, you can doubt my game theory chops all you want, but i spent a couple years playing poker and have over 20,000 hands of poker data saved in Poker Office over the time i played. i found that the skills that i used in poker (and poker is ALL about assessing risk - pushing your edge when...

look, randomness implies UNPREDICTABILITY that is simply not the case in trading. i have just over 20 different setups. some only present opportunities once every 6 months or so (and i am an intraday scalper), others are usually at least a couple of times a day or so so, i have one...

the corollary is - a PhD will not guarantee positive alpha based on my estimations, it may not even help as a trader-trainer, i'd prefer somebody like a competitive athlete, type A, down to earth, common sense type .