Search results

an "experience?" Are you writing us from death row now (or are you referring to some of your pals on death row)?

I don't know the law of thermodynamics. However, evolution makes total sense. Its based on survival of the fittest (system, organism, whatever). What's so hard to understand about that?

I like that one! :)

technically nobody "experienced" it. To experience something, you have to be alive. But everyone gets your point obviously.

I wouldn't simply use my "impressions," but if it is one component of what someone else uses for their view, I wouldn't dictate to said person what he or she shouldn't believe spiritually. Questioning or challenging a person is one thing, but telling someone that they don't have an "excuse" to...

On the former, that depends on what the assertion is! On the latter, we often believe things socially about people that we can't absolutely prove. Sometimes we use deductive reasoning to make probability judgements, and sometimes we simply get a certain impression from someone and make...

What "evidence to the contrary?"

Wow, so many of the brightest mathematicians and philosophers (philosophers who do high level math-logic research on the most abstract concepts) make these very valid points, but yet they are just lack the "intellectual apparatus" to distinguish between proof and non-proof (I guess that's what...

Actually blue is blue because that's how our (not even all of us for that matter) sense of sight sees it, regardless of how a "blue" object is measured in wave length. Just a small point.

www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/space/09/20/cosmic.radiation.reut/index.html

"Proof it." Since you corrected me on a misspelled word (and were very obnoxious about it), I have caught several mistakes on your part. And that is just on the posts of yours I bothered to read (I haven't read most of your posts for the last 100 pages).

Exactly. This was my point, although I didn't express it as well as I should have, grammatically or conceptually (I should proof read before I post, but I'm too lazy).

Wow, this reminds me of the South Park episode where they used the word s**t dozens of times. Do you have such a potty mouth in the office buddy! I have a suggestion, next time just say "oooooooooh fudge." Or maybe, "It's a cat FAULKER, it doesn't have an opposable thumb for crying out loud." Or...

I don't know. I can see a really trashy girl writing it. But then again, your last three sentences make a lot of sense (especially the part about not blaming men for any and all her failures).

Its not good stuff. For one thing, saying that the chances of life developing to such complexity is such a small chance only reflects the chances it would happen each and every moment of every place. Yet, over time, with all the molecules smacking around, sooner or later it would and did happen...

WHAT THE HELL DO YOU TRADE??????

I was actually thinking the exact same things!! I decided not to bother addressing too many issues, including that one, but it's probably for the better that you did!

More whiny victimhood crap. These were jokes. I grew up with sisters, and let me tell you (as you know I'm sure) that women talk just as much trash about men!!! Moreover, I know what it is to be maxed out in debt and not know how I was going to pay rent. I had great grades and recommendations...

I was just curious. It seemed that were putting down the idea that if a God exist, it could, to some extent at least, be beyond our ability to fully comprehend it. It was in that context that you referred to an "infantile creation." I just wanted clarification, but I figured you were talking...

With all dure respect, this last debate was pretty much more of the "great taste"/"less filling" stuff that we've covered over and over. As far as Danny and Dolt (copyright 02 me), eventually it resembled more of a guy on the sidewalk trying to talk reason to a homeless schizo guy who is talking...