Search results

Bailout work only for those receiving it. There is a net loss for the whole system when bailouts are issued.

Should all roads and highways be privatized??? http://mises.org/story/3416 http://mises.org/story/3415

+5

It matters for economics but not for big govt.

Dude how depressing!!!!!!!!!! The guy is a FOOL.

Define failure...............

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&sid=a8tjEzB.d.kU&refer=economy When I read stuff like that i fell like ####???

Alright................. Since last year the FED has increase cash reserves by unimaginable amounts. Under the present % reserve requirements many are expecting a very high inflationary period to come in the future. However, I am saying that maybe the FED will increase the required reserve...

So what?? Do you understand what the reserve requirement means??? Do you understand fractional reserve lending??? If you do read again.

I think one way the FED will be able to stop the coming massive inflation is to raise % on required reserves. This will easier to do when the crisis is over (could take 2 or 3 more years...some say) AND a higher % on required reserves can shield "a little" on how big bubbles can become...

IF YOU FIND IT TOO LONG READ FROM THE 7 PARAGRAPH DOWN. THANKS AS THE G20 summit showed, we typically regulate in the midst of a bust. That is when righteous politicians feel the need to do something, bankers’ frail balance-sheets and vivid memories make them eschew risk, and regulators...

Of course.

I was recently in a discussion about different schools of economics thought ........................and there was a major agreement that if we had a free financial system (no FED) Austrians would provably be dead. The main argument is that Austrians are "too philosophical" ............mainstream...

define domestic and global for me please

Keynesian is Fascism. Mussolini defined fascism as being a partnership between the state and corporations. "his own words" Keynes provided the means for such an thing to happen in our "free world" to save the "free market". :(

Agree............what about U3 VS. U6?? and real inflation being 8% annually

Unemployment: http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/undercounting-underemployed/ Inflation: http://mwhodges.home.att.net/inflation.htm

So far all I know is that they what to give the IMF more power. This just means more debt for other countries.............specially those "developing ones". Any ideas??:) http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13070

Not so much an outcome.............govt is both the decease and the cure (this cure is sometimes worse than than the decease). It is interventionism what creates distortions in the economy at aggregate levels.

I know the govt has changed the way they calculate unemployment rate..............but how can you tell 12% now is really 29%??? I hope it gets better soon.