Search results

FWIW http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2010/04/more-on-expedited-fed-meeting.html http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=site:federalreserve.gov+%22Notice+of+a+Meeting+under+Expedited+Procedures%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=f&oq=&gs_rfai=

Agree about the game - but they aren't taking us there just yet IMO. Tomorrow DEMTDAYBOYZ take us up... and probably hold off the bears until close. They'll close it positive or flat as usual :) Next week there will be some conspicuous selling... maybe forming the head of an IHS on the...

A pullback is already underway... it will get the boiler stoked again for the run to 1200+ The powers that be are making sure the markets close up or flat even though there is a fair amount of selling going on. Pretty soon the selling will be much more conspicuous. That's when it gets...

Senor "F" - are you smiling yet? DEMTDAYBOYZ are amazing... gap it up... run it up... then let the bears do their thing and get it out of their system. At the end of the day everything still looks up, up, up.

One of my favorite family guy cut away bits - the setup is something like "this is worse than when Dick Cheney got hired as a greeter at WalMart" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxFc1RMbko4

LOL I guess it's true that one man's trash is another man's treasure. (....and thanks for the explanation)

Sorry if I am asking something that has been answered already... Is NVEC in final universe because it is a tenured stock? I checked it against parameters, rank and score and it failed to make the cut.

You read me right. I saw the market the way you describe it now. I entered on the FTT. It FBO'd on weak vol. I exited and took a small loss (wash). I am wondering: was this FTT special? Is there something I missed that should have made me hesitate on the entry?

I have a question about the FBO around 14:40. This seemed like a reasonable short... "forest" level FTT on the ES... FTT on the YM... high volume mark lower than previous high volume. Well, OK I know it IS a reasonable short (or at least I think it is). The only problem is that the market...

In bundlemaker's video on channels he mentions a tip Spyder gave him regarding annotating: "Let the bar close (a) -- then let the next bar (b) close -- THEN involve (a) in your annotations" This is so cool. This puts you squarely in non-prediction mode. All of the tools we are...

FWIW - I have a different volume total for the bar at 10:30... who is your data provider? My 10:30 bar is taller then the 10:35 bar (the one you are asking about)

We've had three cases today where the gaussian switch happens inside of one 5 minute bar. I will put together some graphics later to illustrate this.

I agree with Ivo here... the YM tells the story of the opening beautifully.

This is a great illustration of why we "sweep down" to the YM... the YM tells the story perfectly for that time period... pt1 to pt2 on rising black vol - pt3 on falling red. FTT on rising black - falling red - switch. But hey - that is totally useless if you didn't have the "forest view"...

Fantastic post! Great analogy.

:) :) :) :D

Try this at home: Open up a chart with just volume. Scroll the chart off the screen vertically. Try to recreate the price by just looking at the volume. (just use colored bars of the same volatility at first - then try to nail the volatility too) Compare your chart to the actual chart.

Many thanks for your reply Spyder.

Hiya Spyder - I have a question for you. On today's chart - you have a buy marked around 10:30 AM. This is the last R2L traverse of a channel that keeps expanding volatility to the left. We've had one of these a day for the last few days -- high volume -- volatility gets pushed out at...

Amen to that.