Search results

that's a different question, isn't it? individually, if this guy did what he is accused of doing, we would probably all be fighting to be first in line to wield the pliers. however the thread does not center on individual action, but on sanctioning selective unconstitutional and...

here's (a lot) more of her: http://www.gwool.com/evelina.stm {warning: rated-R}

irony.

the 'freak', the CIA, and the Pentagon at least have one thing in common - none of them prevented Sept. 11. (but the freak is cheaper :p )

you are arguing just to argue. Fact: Iraq should be bombed Q) why? A) because he killed his own people in the past Q) ok, but most countries have done that, even your own. does that per se justify a preemptive war by a third party? A) so what?

thanks for the suggestion - I'll try to think straighter in the future. ElCubano raised good points with regard to the above. The comparison with Castro is interesting. The other points make nice slogans, but do they justify a preemptive war, by themselves? Lincoln killed 250,000 of his...

I'm not promoting anything. I'm asking a question. N. Korea and Iraq - are they run by madmen? If so, why? are China, Pakistan, and India also run by madmen, or do they possess sanity as they 'acquire' their "WMDs"? should they be bombed and overthrown, either as a first or last action?

thanks for the correction. permit me to amend: should then the US bomb and overthrow all governments pursuing the acquisition of "WMDs"? and how would you define "madmen"?

should then the US bomb and overthrow all governments possessing "WMDs"?

who has time to think about such trivia, in the midst of an operation to liberate oppressed peoples and move millions of personnel around the world to rework the global political structure? get your priorities straight - what are you, French?

agree with you here - at least to the extent that there is actually anything there to be undone... :D

great post. you won't find many takers here for that kind of thinking, afraid to say, but it's welcomed nonetheless.

yes indeed. finally we are seeing some success in the war on drugs. and the pundits said it wasn't worth the trillions of dollars.... but with god's help and the support of decent americans (tm), ashcroft will continue the good fight against this kind of dangerous menace to society, along...

good question...

another moron grandstanding for joe and jane sixpack.

maybe the French don't want planes flying into their buildings.

taodr - didn't you see the newest directive? they aren't "taking it over," they're "liberating oppressed iraqis" wonder though if the market is feeling oppressed by the further oppression of US citizens paying oppressive taxes due to retaliatory terrorism and global hatred, and the future...

the jist of this essay is "don't complain, because it could be worse"?

I would disagree with that translation. but even if true, it would make it no better, the argument is nonsensical. does France in your view gain the moral authority to violate international agreements because the US makes money trading with the Chinese? Can Germany insult and dismiss the US as...

lol... my question is why is this pos still around to make tape recordings? $350 billion/yr. defense budget, over a million military personnel, spy satellites, the latest and greatest technologies, and they can't get one guy? meanwhile they're spending 2 billion a day in Iraq, wasting...