Search results

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040501/ap_on_re_mi_ea/prisoner_abuse&cid=540&ncid=716 Just plain dumb! How the fuck could these stuuuuupid morons be so dumb? Christ there are some complete retards. (And I did suspect that those army intelligence tests were too...

harry, you're brilliant. Did they base Mel Gibson's character in that conspiracy movie on you?

1) Yes, you betcha there are exceptions. Obviously most young chicks aren't going to be as experienced, but with a bit of local knowledge you can find out about the ones that are. Case in point, that 16yo I had when I was 23 was magnificent; she started fucking when she was 14, and by the...

Oh, thank God somebody here understands. You know, I don't think Aphie's ever had a "freebie" before. He probably thinks you have to 'romance' and wine and dine the bitch first. Well, sure, a lot of the time you do. But just because you can earn $20 flippin' burgers doesn't mean you...

Yes, yes! My God, I've think you've got it! In any case -- who cares! :D

Lol. Er, I wasn't exactly "dating" her! And now at 27 you're seriously going out with a 16 yo? I mean come on... for the chick its awesome (again, I'm telling you how us girls see it) Again, I'm hardly "going out with" her. Lol. Where do you people get such stupid ideas? And, oh...

Obviously, we don't want to read too much into any one individual data point, however that does seem encouraging. Even if ultimately accurate, liberal claims of Iraq as the best possible Al Qaeda recruitment tool don't appear to have increased terrorist activity yet.

I understand your point, too, Magna. I have little doubt that much of the reason for the current state of affairs is because Arabs are some of most ignorant and obstinate people on planet earth. I don't like your "alien invaders" analogy because in that case there would be no precedent...

I await an equally eloquent response...

With respect to Hiroshima/Nagasaki, I don't think it's as clear cut as either of the two extreme positions on it try to make it. An interesting question is would there be any doubt about which light we'd view Nazi Germany's (or Japan's) use of an atomic bomb against an American target in...

I guess I'm just imagining something called the 'Geneva Convention' and the trials taking place in the Hague for those who controvened it during the wars in the former Yugoslavia.

But magna, what if this "occupying power" gave you a clear 'use by date' by which time they would hand back the reigns of power to you? What if major focus of their time in occupation of your land was in order to (a) firstly free you from a tyrannical regime and (b) set you up with a proven...

As I've pointed out before, candletrader, insurgents in Iraq -- 'freedom fighters' as some media morons have dubbed them -- must be the stupidist people in history: why are they fighting for their 'freedom', when the US is already guaranteeing them their freedom? In case you've forgotten, the...

Just wanted to alert my American friends here that after tonight the EU will be 10 countries and 75 million people bigger. Yes, I know many of you think Europe stopped being relevant a long time ago (or maybe only since they rejected the war in iraq), but 455 million people presents a...

resinate, as one of the resident 'right wing thugs' of ET, I hope I can ease your mind a little by saying that I agree that the use of the atomic bombs in Japan is very difficult to justify, perhaps unjustifiable. And that yes, the US -- as virtually all nations -- has 'blood on its hands'...

Rofl. Riiiiggghht Mav! "Hate speech isn't protected by the first amendment". Oh, oh, oh,....but I didn't mean all hate speech. Oh, oh...and I made this "very clear". Of course you did, mav, of course you did. :D

Whoa there buddy! You'd better watch out. 'Cos according to you, what you just did isn't protected by your first amendment rights in America.

You -- you loo-hoo-zer -- were the one that the right to free speech doesn't mean the right to "hate speech". Which is obviously not true, because it certainly does include the right to hate speech. Not the right to 'fighting words', as you keep bringing up, but the right to 'hate speech'...

Mav, er, unlike you, I actually know something about the topic. If you think that that is the sole definition of 'hate speech', and that that case is defining piece of case law you are so wrong it absolutely laughable. 'Hate speech' does not equal only 'fighting words'. I know you're madly...

Yes, exactly! But that isn't 'hate speech' dipshit.