Search results

Most of Jack's chart loose me. There are many things I don't get and appear to me as inconsistencies compared to the litterature. Apart from this, from I've just seen before posting this, is that he uses close of the bar outside of BM to pu BMrev. Which contradicts my current understanding of...

I've had a long day of thinking deeply, reading and finally did not do the log again. Tomorrow ;) Just as I was thinking about, here is a little example of my current understanding of the application of the pattern I've built on a real chart. Not very interesting for now, just wanted to produce...

MADA on 07/19/19 Chart & Log - part 2 And it's enough for the practicing part about true BO,T1 and BMrev by penetration. Back to 07/08/19's chart from Bar 1

MADA on 07/19/19 Chart & Log - part 1 Note on bar 10:30 : I don't see BO,T1 anymore cause P2 is already there, so it's just BO of RTL, and there is no EE associated to this "poor" condition of ending a trend. I only see then BM,rev. Note on bar 10:45-10:50-10:55 : on 10:45 we have a TI...

Since I've reread this passage by myself a bit before you wrote it, I have begun to think about it. It began to make sense to me, and the more I thought about it, the more it was making sense. After you mentionned it, it's making even more sense. I feel there's something very very very important...

For that I've been building this kind of posts for a while now, I know/can perceive there is work, thinking, organization and a dose of devotion in your write up. I wanna say I appreciate it a lot and give you thanks @tiddlywinks

Chart & Log on 070819- part 2 It is not complete for the following reason : On last bar of the snippet, so bar 12:15, retro backwards is activated. So on 12:00 we had already P2 and then we get : 12:05 : volume is between P2 and T1 so T2P. 12:10 : volume is between T2P and T1 so T2F. 12:15 ...

Chart & Log on 070819- part 1 I have to study the "both BO,T1 and BMrev" scenarios. It sounds to me like it deals with the OOE inside the OOE. I see it like : BO,T1 happens before BMrev so I search for a link between PP4 and BO,T1, and then, being as the EE that came inside the OOE was...

Update : After rethinking about it, here was the scenario : 10:45 : PP4 so if next bar is measurable, P1 will be assigned 10:50 : this bar is measureable, so P1 assigned. 10:55 : once degapped we have StR UL so P1 repeats 11:00 : relatively we have XB, volume is measured we have T1 under...

I'm definitely overworked if I commit this kind of errors

Thank you very much

Chart & Log on 070519- part 4-5

Chart & Log on 070519- part 3

Chart & Log on 070519- part 2 Note : 11:40 bar has been interesting for me

@Sprout , my lack of differenciation led you in the past to explain/label things on my own charts that are nowadays revealing wrong. I understand why. What is true at a certain moment is wrong at another and vice-versa.

Thank you very much for your contribution. AND Here is my reasoning leading me to still see a PP1a : From what I understand currently, for PP1 and PP1a, we need to see an acceleration on the dependant variable which comes from accelerating tl's AND the additional requirement is that one...

Chart & Log on 070519- part 1

Chart & Log on 070319- part 3 For a reason that I currently ignore, on this session volume falls under 2.5k after bar 45; in addition to that, bar 45 is 13:10 and suddenly next bar is 18:00. I don't know where this phenomenom comes from. In any case, I can't ensue the log on this session due...

Chart & Log on 070319- part 2

Chart & Log on 070319- part 1