Search results

  1. A

    MurreyMath

    LOL...:)
  2. A

    MurreyMath

    OK, you pretty well have proved all the people right who thought you to just be a paper trader jerking off. You sidestep two important issues: 1. "It's my application of MM" - forget it, that's ridiculous. Either you're using MM or you're not. You can't preach about how MM is the most...
  3. A

    MurreyMath

    OK, I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt initially, but you've lost me. If you don't "bother" with the S&P as you've suddenly asserted, why the heck are you pretending to be trading it by posting things like "I'm going to short at XXX"?? If you're not trading it, you're...
  4. A

    MurreyMath

    Then what ARE you trading off the SPX? You're quoting entry numbers apparently based on the cash index and talking about shorting the S&P, except you can't trade the cash index directly - got to use SPYdrs or the index futures. But then why wouldn't you just use the actual instrument you're...
  5. A

    MurreyMath

    So you're trading the S&P futures without actually looking at the ES realtime chart (just the cash index - which doesn't actually update continuously in realtime and doesn't reflect the futures premium fluctuations)?
  6. A

    MurreyMath

    Actually your target was hit (check the low of the ES daily bar - 903.75) but I suppose if you don't look at the ES until 9:30am you would have missed it. The ES morning price action tends to be developing starting around 7am. By then prices were already below your 908.4 level and...
  7. A

    MurreyMath

    Sarasota - What price did you start the Square of Nine rotations to for today and what incremental angles are you using?
  8. A

    MurreyMath

    Odd - So much for the S&P being overbought :) That's the problem I mentioned with the 16 bar daily frame - the 32 frame shows the better perspective on the multi-month price action - you probably also got an immediate frame shift this morning too that blew out your previous picture on the...
  9. A

    MurreyMath

    OK, setting aside all the irrelevant BS about inertial mass, Galileo, Einstein, and whether Murrey's just a hypster trying to ride on Gann's ideas (although that seems like a very good probability). I'll ask some more directly applicable questions. It sounds like your plan is to short at the...
  10. A

    E-signal

    I used the quote.com SDK and received their SDK email group - eSignal is absolutely right to limit their SDK to only corporate (i.e., real third party software companies) developers. Fully opening their SDK to non-corporate developers doesn't get them a significant incremental increase in...
  11. A

    DUAL P4 motherboard

    Interesting results on AutoCad. Given the lack of significant improvement with dual processors, one would conclude that either the program either isn't multi-threaded or has inherent inter-thread resource dependencies that cause the threads to spend too much time blocked to be effective...
  12. A

    DUAL P4 motherboard

    Does that mean that because it's off the shelf software it's OK it's a pig? With no material decrease in rendering time between a 500 Mhz laptop and a dual 1.2 GHz system desktop, it is clearly horribly inefficient (aka "a pig"). But as I said, as long as you're happy with what you've got -...
  13. A

    DUAL P4 motherboard

    The answer's pretty simple, Bryce is a pig. With very little reduction in rendering time, the renderer is (1) not multi-threaded (or if it is, then it has excessive inherent thread contention that effectively makes it single threaded) and therefore can't benefit from dual processors and/or...
  14. A

    DUAL P4 motherboard

    In the most simplistic situation of one single threaded program running, that would be true. But with complex job mixes, it only may or may not be true. That's why I said that looking into a second processor makes sense - not that it was the ONLY thing to look at doing. Operating dynamics...
  15. A

    DUAL P4 motherboard

    Quick additional thoughts for clarification: 1. There's still a misunderstanding - a SINGLE program that wants to benefit from dual processors does need to be multi-threaded. More than one program running in the job mix do NOT have to be "tweaked" to benefit from multiple processors...
  16. A

    DUAL P4 motherboard

    Since I'm the one who used the "MP-enabled operating system" term, let me clarify. The term DOES mean multi-processor. Multi-tasking is simply a rudimentary function of any operating system's scheduler and can be done on boxes with only one processor. MP-enabled operating systems have...
  17. A

    Why does six monitors have to be so hard?

    elindy - Re: clarity of analog vs. digital monitors - the probable reason your analog monitors don't seem as clear (or vice versa, the digital monitors seem to have enhanced clarity) is that your analogs are supporting 1600x1200 resolution but don't actually have the full complement of scan...
  18. A

    DUAL P4 motherboard

    You must have missed that Multiprocessor Operating Systems 101 class. That's EXACTLY what any MP-enabled operating system (like Windows 2K/XP) does - and the software apps don't have to be written in any "special way" either. In fact, the whole process is completely transparent to the...
  19. A

    Simple Vix Question

    The VIX is a measure of "implied" volatility, not actual volatility. The reason it's sometimes called a fear index is because implied volatility essentially indicates how much of a premium (over intrinsic value) people are willing to pay to buy options. As a general rule, other things being...
  20. A

    Qcharts

    That's been their policy since the beginning (you pay for one user name - you use it on one machine at a time). They just used to have a hole in their server authentication that you could game by connecting two PCs to different quote servers. They fixed it about a year or so ago.
Back
Top