Search results

Shit, They make them that way. School, college, CNN, etc...

He just does not believe that a handful of individuals shape and control world's finances and geo-politics. Nothing wrong with it, he is probably an american, most americans do not believe in evolution either.

I'd like to solicit some feedback. Please see attached.

.

Ok here's my theory. I real time I was very confident that 14:50 [close of] was change. Very confident. When market created the real Pt3, my first theory was that 14:25 [close of] is non-dominant because it was inside the lateral and 14:30 [close of] is non-dom because of Lateral BO. Then 14:45...

I think I figured out why 12:26 [close of] YM gave permision to seek change. It created VE and as such that part of the bar was dominant, therefore that fact that the bar is spike is irrelevant - red became dominant again and Jokari Window change followed.

.

.

sequences

lateral madness:D

.

.

:D You got my full and undivided attention.

IMO 14:50 close of does not exhibit acceleration of gaussian curve IMO. Looks more like a 'heads up' showing decreased volatilty on increased volume to me. I entertain the possibility that the next bar (VE on decr. Volume) is Jokari window signal for change. 12:50 close of yesterday - same...

.

.

I see an uncompleted sequence for a 2nd dominant traverse of an up channel (part of super-channel). Don't see confirmed pt3 yet. Expecting completion of sequence and a signal for change before beginning of a new sequence.

And a textbook Jokari Window: Price Moves in the non- dominant direction (after previously moving dominant) on increasing Volume. :D ¡Ay, caramba! And another case of looking but not seeing on my part.

Makes sense now. Thank you.

Thank you. I see no other choice but to attribute return to dominance to increasing red volume on 14:25 [close of] Bar, since 14:30 [close of] is obviously lateral BO.