Search results

Please explain your objective thinking to the Supreme Court. They obviously didn't get the memo. :D

You're preaching to the choir. I'm simply trying to explain why the birth certificate is not the smoking gun. :D

In addtion to subversive and ulterior motive for seeking office, equally as important, no legal or moral claim by any other nation and complete loyalty to the US without having any psychological struggling with conflicted allegiance and loyalty to any other nation. This the true intent of the...

Agreed, but I'm more inclined the records would show he attended as a foreign student. You can always plead your views have changed, but dual citizenship status would be a legal hurdle he could not overcome.

Good question. There are two camps, one that believes the constitution is an evolving document, and the other who believes the constitution should be enforced as written. As a nation, we have a long history of trampling on the Constitution, for instance, the 14th amendment. It was essentially...

To distract attention away from the real issue at hand; Obama's dual citizenship at birth. This breaks the natural born intent of sole allegience to the US, which is clearly defined by the framers.

To understand the legal meaning of Natural Born, one must first look back at the intent at the time of the writing, which was, sole allegiance to the US. The founders were trained and experienced in Old English Common Law, and the term Natural Born can be found as far back as the sixteenth...

This is why I previously stated the birth certificate issue is being kept alive as a diversion tactic. Let’s assume Obama was indeed born on US soil. Because Obama’s father was neither born in the US or a citizen of the US, by legal definition, Obama is a native born 14th Amendment American...

I hope I am not offending here or derailing the thread; I was inquiring about how people were getting their targets for the ES that others were openly discussing and were posted here. Nothing more intended. I'll leave everyone to do their chest thumping and penis comparisons as they wish. A...

Silly me!!!!! And here I thought it was you trying to convince me of just that. :eek: And for the record, I do seem to recall you offered to share the formula for the asking, followed by "there are no secrets", thus my reason for asking, only now to be told by you...............oh, never...

Nah, I get it. We had all the information we needed at 1:00PM to call a long at 1277 for one point profit, then a cancel order at 3:00PM due to missing entry by one tick. :eek: You did lose me, however, back when you were explaining how someone may be arriving at their numbers with the first...

Sure!!!! "Can you post after the fact predictions using fibs???" What do I win? :D

Did you arrive at that using the 1:05PM bar high and the 1:15PM bar low X 2.618? And if so, then R10 would then be 1269 if 1259 is hit? All this cryptic rhetoric is nothing more than fib numbers and an expected bounce of ten points? What am I missing? :confused: Thank you and everone else...

Would you be kind enough to write in crayon for us mentally challenged folks what "sweeper" and R10 is so we can at least pretend to follow along with the argument? I am assuming R10 is a pivot of some sorts, perhaps S/R 1.0, but wasn't able to locate a definition anywhere. Thanks!

Posted at 10:15AM EST ES LOD 1257.75 @ 12:15PM EST Outstanding prediction. "Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do"- Benjaman Franklin.

It's a diversion tactic, pure and simple. As long as the powers that be can keep the masses divided fighting over a birth certificate, they divert attention away from the fact Obama doesn’t meet the intent of the eligibility requirements for POTUS per Article II, Section One, Clause Five of...

To spook the opposition?

re: "Why would anyone care if a soldier was gay?" Why would anyone care? Other than most homosexuals being effeminate drama queens? If you have to ask the question, you most likely will never "get it". Allowing a homosexual in the military is like wanting a mouse in a cheese factory.

The US Constitution “is full of exclusions and special rights” only by amendment, which is why Article Five exists; to allow the country's necessities to change over time without the need to re-write the Constitution. With that said, a rational person would have a difficult time successfully...

The founders were granted immunity from their allegiance status of birth via the "Grandfather Clause" of Article II in the Constitution. No where in the Constitution is Obama given any such forgiveness.