Search results

What you say sounds reasonable, thanks. Speaking of putting the cart before the horse, are you suggesting I produce the performance statistics based on simulated results or real results? Answering that may bring us full circle back to the beginning so to speak. Also, if you don't mind telling me...

Certainly. The parts which contradict and expose the half truth misrepresentations running rampant is "generally true". It wasn't just reading it, conversations with articulate people and appreciating the difference between the words exegesis and eisegesis (http://dictionary.reference.com/) were...

@martin, sle, heech - thanks for your comments it might help to read this thread through from the beginning but i should state that i am trading discretionary based on my experience which is why most of the standard backtesting data was not provided, i also just mentioned this forward testing...

I never said this. If you extrapolate from the follow up posts, it's very clear I am forward testing but you're right that I never explicitly said that. This is admitted and forms the basis of the question. If you go back I note that making the period any longer doesn't make sense. Hence why I...

I don't want to leap to conclusions, but it seems like you are avoiding answering, so in that case let me rephrase: 1. What information did I provide that you used to base your risk calculation? How did you use that info to determine a risk level? 2. Either you calculated this...

To repeat: "What I learned is that 99% of those criticizing scripture have not read any of it, much of it, know any historical context and generally are quite ignorant.: It's not really your fault, it certainly wasn't mine when I was a fool. What was my fault to some degree was constantly...

Thanks for that point, I agree that investors factor in risk when looking at returns. So I have two questions for you: 1. What did you base your risk calculation on or how did you determine the risk level in this proposal? 2. How did you then calculate or conclude this "isn't attractive...

I don't call myself a Christian, but I've actually read parts of scripture. What I learned is that 99% of those criticizing scripture have not read any of it, much of it, know any historical context and generally are quite ignorant. They wouldn't even know the outline of an Introduction to...

I don't call myself a Christian, but I've actually read parts of scripture. What I learned is that 99% of those criticizing scripture have not read any of it, much of it, know any historical context and generally are quite ignorant. They wouldn't even know the outline of an Introduction to...

Oh and just to top it all off, I've got you beat by about 4 months. So who is new again? Foot --> mouth --> remove. So now that you are the new guy, do you still stand by your comments about eating feces and what not? Like the other poster said, I hope you are into that or else, well, I'd...

So just because you say so or someone else says so or some newspaper / tv person who doesn't know up from down reads a pre-scripted talking point from a teleprompter ... that makes it true. That is the golden standard for judging what is accurate information, right? If he's a kook, PROVE IT...

It matters not who I am, it does matter what I say, and more importantly what other people DO NOT say ... as I've repeated and you're ignoring, giving us lots of info about your level of attention to detail and overall skills in reasoning and logic. Keep it up. It's some good stuff. BTW...

LOL. The ignorant (i.e. uninformed) person here is the one who can't back up what they say. Who call people names and then think that is proof. Who say other people have poor arguments when they can't even argue with an intelligent 8 year old. Here about about this: YOU just don't know...

Lots of people write things or think things and then change their mind. I'm sure you and me and everyone else is the same. I've been deluded into thinking stupid things and then on MY OWN figured out they were wrong. The world isn't perfect. If you want to talk about saying stupid stuff...

Once again, just stating things like you are God and offering no proof. How about this: YOU have no idea. But if that is your only retort, I was correct in my previous assessment of you. LOL ... see? Do you get it yet or are you here on auto pilot, brain put on hold in storage?

LOL ... ad hominem at all lately? I could have ZERO posts, either what I say is true and accurate or it is not. Instead of addressing what is being said, you ramble on about 47 posts. Then to put the cherry on top, you say something about "ignoring". Go hang out with the bureaucrats err...

LOL ... spoken like a true "foreigner". Gotta love those who declare things without backing them up, spoken with true intellectual honesty! (puke) Here, how about I do this: Newt is just an old idiot with many mentality issues, he has naive and dangerous polices. THat's it. Cuz I said so. Yep...

What's the difference between a neo-conservative and a conservative? I suggest Newt is neo-con (at best) and Paul is the opposite.

You mean the phone that let's you take the battery out? That iPhone? DOH

There's some dirt 'out there' already, forget exactly what it was but it was being talked about on radio I think.