Search results

More avoid, distract, ignore. Again, like the energizer bunny! Please tell us what the difference is between "in context" and "out of context". One step at a time. Let's deal with this and then move on to your quotes.

And those who are the most well rounded will often take a more cooperative attitude realizing all stakeholders have vested interests, working together produces better results than constantly trying to take advantage and squeeze everyone everyway everywhere. I'm talking about the kind of people...

Few are on this thread, but at least some are right? Ok, so you mispoke and half-heartedly non-apologized. Frankly, I will take what I can get. As for the rest of your comment, thank you for sharing one aspect of your your personal human nature. I will gladly say I am the opposite by nature...

Certainly and as usual you are too busy arguing about how right you think you are instead of participating in the conversation. There is no "historical evidence" as the term is being used here to prove that murder is wrong, that raping and pillaging is evil. There is some scripture that tell...

Please answer the question and participate in the conversation instead of avoiding, distracting, derailing, etc. What is the difference between an in context quote and an out of context quote?

Actually in 1 Corinthians it says that you can be the smartiest smarty pants, but if you don't how to love, how to be kind and nice ... then your words are not nearly as intelligent as you think they are! Why? Because you lack that perspective otherwise. Clearly this does praise intelligence and...

Which god with a small g would that be? Oh and once again you continued with the ignore and avoid. You say complete crap, I call you on it and then you avoid answering. I guarantee more spiteful arrogance in response here! :D

I read this yesterday and just didn't know what to say. I'm amazed. Like I said, I left this thread alone for a few days because I didn't like where it was going. Too much blind antagonism blocking out reasoned rationality. Now, really, thinking about this ... is there really not ONE, not ONE...

Cmon FT .... stop the avoid, distract, derail, distract, etc. Reply. Do you know what the definition of "in context" is? Please participate in the conversation or keep adding to the evidence that you are here to propagandize. I asked you to "show us one quote from the New Testament that IN...

LOL. You do this on purpose right? I've repeated to you outright and very clearly that I am the exact opposite of this. On both counts. I've said it probably 10 or more times. You've made this up before and I've asked you to show me where I said that. You never did ... because I never did...

Let me ask you this: do you need historical evidence if something makes sense? Let's step back a bit. Have you read the New Testament yes or no? If not, that's ok we can wait. If you have the question is, what do you disagree with exactly? Which advice is bad? There are reputable sources of...

One effect of your behaviour here is that the conversation gets lost and hard to follow after pages and pages of your going in circles. Whether you do it on purpose (it appears so) or by accident doesn't matter, it still happens, is unnecessary and annoying. So let's try again: Try answering...

I stayed away from this thread for a few days because I didn't like where it was going. I don't want to be antagonistic or feel that way, the point is to talk openly, reasonably, rationally like intelligent adults. So that being said. If you don't think my points matter it seems appropriate...

Cmon FT .... stop the avoid, distract, derail, distract, etc. Reply. Do you even know what the defintion of "in context" is? If not, keep on proving you are here to be a propagandist. Your choice.

You started another thread because you continue the avoid, detract, derail, distract, attack, hijack and RUN tactic that is popular. Popularity does not determine goodness, not that many years ago it was popular to kill certain races and other categories of people. That is not goodness, and many...

Wait. Just one sec. Put the phone on hold. Are you ACTUALLY saying that something from an athiest is out of context?! <gasp> No way, get out, what the?!?

No. Anyone else go ahead, but no.

I can only think of one reason, to teach us something about God we don't know yet. Agreed though.

If you wish to participate in a productive conversation, be helpful, and pro-free market can you please respond to the following: I would like to challenge anyone who thinks that simulating is "EASIER" and "NOT REAL" to just go ahead and simulate consistent results on par with mine for 30...

Can you possibly IGNORE and AVOID most of the points I've raised any more clearly? Are you a politician? Sigh, this isn't why I hesitated to post originally but it is another entirely good reason: the inability to comprehend written english.