Search results

Chart for today. I'm not up to par with the current annotation convention (it makes me confused). If my charts annotated using the 'old style' is confusing for you, please let me know and I'll stop posting them. Not that they wouldn't be confusing whatever the annotation style used :D .

Spyder, thank you for your thorough response. Now, there is new hope :) .

I have to answer no - I can't see what you are describing. Not even now, after your post, when I know it to be so, can I describe why it must be so. To me, what you are describing sounds like the end goal - SCT. If I could see what you describe - in real time - I would always be in, long or...

Chart for today. Fractal jumping could be considered a sport, right? I got a lot of exercise today. Have a great weekend. :)

A bit late to the party, but here goes. IMHO there could be several "correct" answers depending on context (please correct me if I am wrong). We can start looking for change (PT2 - PT3) on bar 4, depending on what price is doing there and on bar 5. Thanks for posting that ehorn. I wasn't...

Thank you, Avi 8.

ES for today. I stopped posting my charts a while back. I know I'm still not up to par with many of you girls and boys, but maybe this is of use anyhow. I for one enjoy comparing charts. I'm still with NT, although I prefer TN. I can't really justify what would be a third feed only for...

Maybe you could elaborate on the similarities that you see? I can't say I see any similarities, but that does not necessarily mean that there aren't any. It might mean that I have more work to do :) .

Price and volume work in concert. You need both to hear the music. At least that is my experience from studying this method.

Spyder has a very good series of posts on MADA here. As far as I know the first references to MADA at ET are from way back when. All journals and other posts by Spyder and Jack are littered with references to MADA, so the above places are far from all where you will find discussions and...

I shouldn't do PRV calculations without a calculator. The correct PRV number is more like 1 192 800 views :D .

<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2155927> :) EDIT: Looks like the journal will reach 1 119 000 page views this year (using PRV). Thank you Spydertrader and all contributors for the best thread on ET.

Sorry about that :) . I got second thoughts since the post could be perceived to single out the tools posted by pepe, which was not my intention at all. From what I understand, they are excellent tools (I have not tried them myself), generously shared here. Sorry for any confusion. Here's...

Yes, you very much get what you pay for (but sometimes not even that). No, you would have to investigate that per instrument per feed. And the feed vendors are not keen on supplying that kind of information. To complicate things further, many feed vendors source data in turn, from companies like...

ljyoung, there will always be differences. Some of them will be due to how your feed vendor handles incoming data and how they're connected to the exchanges, and some of them can be explained through simple stuff like how they handle timestamping (if they indeed do stamp tick data, not all do)...

NT (NinjaTrader) have support for several third party feeds, but I wasn't aware of them having their own. Please enlighten me :) .

Spyder, could you please post the date? Although I can understand everyones thinking (or at least imagine I do) I would like to know when that was, to see the surrounding context. (my attempt, nkhoi, ehorn and tums)

Ok thanks, got it :D . Nice chart btw (colors).

Could you post a snippet? What pt2? :confused: