Search results

You mean: Laterals and lateral movements?

And a last question... you mentioned "End effects". I'm not sure what they are. It could be simply the FTTs, or ftts. But I think the first question is: You are talking about "End effects" of what? Containers? Volume sequences? Something else? You also said that there are two test which...

This is the log. If this is as you expected then we can have a closer look at the content. You didn't comment on the channels. Yesterday I had the impression that somehow the volume sequences and the containers didn't match.

Jack, this is what I translated into my language and the questions which came up. Did I lose something during translation?

If I have to think like an ATS then I have to label EACH volume bar. Possible labels: 1. P(eak), T(rough), X(don't count), I(ncreasing), D(ecreasing) = Two signify change and three continuation 2. P1, T1, P2, T2, P3, X(don't count), I(ncreasing), D(ecreasing) I could even leave out I...

seems I'm missing some of your trades. They are marked with green and red arrows. Maybe that's not the only thing I missed...

Like this?

Bar 23 was theoretically the new T1 but it was then replaced by bar 24. Bar 25 is P2. So far so good?

Critique: 1. Chart does NOT contain volume. SCT heavily relies on volume. Omitting volume is like driving with one half blind eye through rush hour. Volume leads price. Drill: Post charts of one week with perfectly annotated volume gaussians on three fractals! 2. Chart is only annoted on...

You are lucky I'm not home before tomorrow. ;-) Tiki, baro-san, Paddler, etc. please take him by his words. I know it's strange that he can annotate somebody else's chart but can't (won't) take his ownn (which are exquisite btw). Volume annotated as leading indicator. Annotated on three...

The less I know... the more I read. The more I read... the less I know. :) Found a table. But do I understand it? I don't know how the number in the overlap were calculated but do I interpret what I see correctly: The more overlap = less ticks to be gained? Is that "all"?

Sorry guys, I noticed too late that there are more posts I didn't read yet. I'm catching up. Here the two of you are discussing "overlap". For my "vocabulary list" I need to add "Ov"and "Vo". I think they stand for "Overlap" and "Volatility". Is that correct? Overlap can have following...

"category test" = Is it dominant or non-dominant?

Thanks Jack. I'm sure after the recent rumours some people will see your answer as a confirmation that in fact you are not one person but multiple persons. The "real Jack" would NEVER post an answer so short! ;-) Seems like the system showed me the first word of your answer while you were...

OK... makes more sense. When I have a lateral or any internal as a beginner I simply "fold" the price bar and wait. Do I do the same with the volume bars of those internals?

Jack, is there a discrepancy in what you wrote? First you say you went short on bar 67 and then some minutes later you write: ...today bars 65, 66, 67, 68 and 69 did not matter today. No events were contained in them.... If bar 67 didn't matter, why did you went short on that bar?

I'm not sure your bar numbers are the same as mine. Therefore I attach ed a chart. If you went short on bar 8 then what happens on and after bar 13? Your "green bookmark" from bar 8 was broken. This means you revert long on bar 13. Correct? But then on 14 or 15 you revert again?

How many (interlocking) fractals do you "annotate"? Do you annotate... annotate "correctly"? You are using some automated channels. Are those channels correct? In which fractal is happening what? Or are you working with multiple timeframes?

Could also be your computer which is too slow or your internet connection.

Expecting B2B?