Search results

oh yeah, and that reminds me, who will run the Affordable Care Act?

exactly, they are all gamblers except the guy who is convinced he is right and goes all in. Now that guy is in a different category altogether. Prudent risk management is for gamblers. for instance, I have two conservative funds I manage for myself. One is a simple asset allocation fund. Now...

not degenerate, just really serious, as opposed to the gambler who bets a little here a little there hoping to get lucky

only in the traders mind

why not just divide the whole world up into ethnic groups?

How bout a big sign on the door which says "Guns Allowed Enter at Your Own Risk" and let's have a good old Friday night shoot out at the concert. Oh well, better than a massacre I guess.

well at least we know now that the scientists at Exxon are just as smart as the scientists at the university.

my point was, here is a man running for president who claims if you just go to a 36K exemption and flat corporate and flat personal you will eliminate the IRS. So who do you report your 36K exemption to? And who do you report your 16% corporate taxes to? And who collects it if you don't pay? And...

what I meant was not "attract" but eliminate. A little off topic, but I was watching Bernie go on about how health care is a right. So what happens to the rights of a healthcare worker? Back on topic, if engineers tend to be private, we must make them public. Then see who they vote for.

so all we need to solve the worlds problems is some good weather? If it starts raining in so cal valley and az watch out! we are looking at 4% gdp.

according to Ted Cruz, you can eliminate the IRS by simply changing rates.

think about it. who is gambling? the one who says, "I may be right I may be wrong, so I will only risk a little."? Or the one who knows he is right and will risk it all? Which one is the gambler? One is betting a little on an uncertainty. The other is betting it all on a sure thing. I guess they...

oooh, democrats need to do something about that 100:1

If the maximum amount you are willing to lose is not 100%, you are just gambling.

bout time for a good old cyrstal night and purge the country of these moslems. We did it to the jews, we can do it to the moslems. Thank g-d it is already illegal for French women to wear a burkha in public. But they still let them ride trains and vote. I'm just waiting with anxious breath for...

oh man, thanks for that. I've never been a fan of Chris Hedges, but wouldn't it be nice if we could communicate on his level. Then again, Wouldn't it be Nice if they could all be California Girls? I keep waiting for a socialist to show me where their plan has been carried out successfully and...

who is "they" and who that posts on et would not see right through that scam? Hopefully by age 50 most of the money is not tax sheltered and nobody in their right mind would pay cap gains to sell stocks and buy bonds. But at age 50 you are probably 100% stocks and that is a time to back off a...

such false info. Anybody who posts on et already knows who the sharks are. We are not even talking about a cap gains taxable event. We are just saying when you turn 50 you can stop adding to your stocks and start adding to bonds.

When are the French finally going to do something about their gun laws?

if history is any guide, usually "they" are the problem