Search results

  1. M

    Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

    gun bans work about as well as drug bans. Democrats think government solves all, and we are about to irrationally overreact again to make poeple feel good. The monumental waste that is TSA would be puny compared to the effort it would take to get rid of the banned guns, not to mention all the...
  2. M

    Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

    would not his mother have passed even more strict guidlines? Connecticut is already a strong gun law state.
  3. M

    Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

    did you even read this thread? the stats say that no, guns do not make murder more likely and that more deadly attacks are carried out with explosives. to make up so many hypotheticals is pointless, to say he would not have accomplished the same thing with say knives and pipe bombs is...
  4. M

    Petition asking mrbill and others to stay away

    ask, not ban he made a big deal about a boycott as if they are needed here...imagine that, a boycott of an anonymous forum...how pompously self-important can a person be? I'm asking that he and his kind find another forum where they can exchange their devoid-of-any-virtue sophistry. I get...
  5. M

    Democrats call for ban on assault weapons, want commission to examine gun laws, menta

    Using Statistics for an 8 sigma event? stupid, very very stupid Complete logical disconnect on the stats as well: Highest guns per capita: Wyoming, 2.01 firearm murders per 100,000 versus strict gun state connecticut (see http://www.bradycampaign.org/stategunlaws/ ) at 2.71 firearm...
  6. M

    Petition asking mrbill and others to stay away

    In particular I don't miss mrbill or RCG as they added nothing to any discussion I can recall. I don't miss their illogical and empty posts at all. While still acerbic, things seems a little better in here with regard to actually getting something out of the discussion. with all DUE...
  7. M

    Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

    right, that's sort what I meant and it didn't come out right. I don't agree, I think the guy offed himself long before police came, he simply did it when he felt he had done enough. It would be curious to see if he used up his ammo. Had he wanted maximum damage, he would have taken the...
  8. M

    All my liberal friends, suggestion

    I thought you were already gone. Honestly I like it better without you guys, I can do without your empty posts and the discussion seems a little better focussed. Thanks, and please stay away. Better yet find another forum. BSAM providing 'discussion' ..... LOL -god that's dumb...
  9. M

    Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

    to be fair, I don't know red duke's politics that well
  10. M

    Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daegu_subway_fire the point is that they will find a way, and often that way is worse. I don't want unstable people to have guns, nobody does, but strict gun control will not stop them if they are determined to cause harm.
  11. M

    Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

    He didn't use an automatic rifle, and I think you mean semi-automatic. He used 2 pistols. So if he took one pistol with a lot of ammo, this would have been prevented- yeah right.
  12. M

    Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

    it is an important logical issue, that is, are the guns responsible? In places with no guns there should be no killing if futurecurrents is right
  13. M

    Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

    can you read a chart, honest question, do you know how to read the chart? It refutes your first sentence. second sentence- you do not know that. In fact the worst mass murders have been with bombs and not guns, so it could have been much worse You are closed minded by emotion...
  14. M

    All my liberal friends, suggestion

    I've been corrected before, just not very often. Typically I am insulted first, not always but more than half. The real problem is that the other side seldom has any persusive logic or evidence. Pick a topic that you disagree with me on, let's examine the process.
  15. M

    Monetary Insanity

    right, we need to seperate a few things QE is all about financing the deficit and the housing market, the banks are just middlemen with a guaranteed profit on the exchange and price support for their shitty assets the original TARP basically paid the banks to sit on cash the zombie...
  16. M

    Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

    how hard can it be? Really, are you people that goddamn stupid? I have tried over and over again to dumb it down... there is no correlation between gun availability and homicide rate (but there is a strong correlation between culture and homocide rate) <a...
  17. M

    Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

    the act of killing must be initiated by a human, how hard is that to understand? converse the question: if guns disappear, does killing stop? if the answer is yes then you are correct, if the answer is no your logic is flawed
  18. M

    Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

    bwwaahhh LOL....... LMAO... ROFLMAO.... just how does he manage to be so above it all and yet say nothing, HOW? this guy must be Fonzi
  19. M

    Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

    false analogy, another logical fail. I would explain it, but why? you cannot grasp it
  20. M

    Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

    We need to teach a course in logic here. Hypothesis: It's the guns Logical Conclusion: USA would have a far higher homicide rate since USA is where the guns are Data: Mexico has far higher homicide rate Conclusion: Hypothesis is wrong That's right, it's never the person doing...
Back
Top