Search results

OK, now define "confirmed." And, while we're at it, define "evolved." Be careful to leave yourself an out. If you don't, I'm gonna hand you your ass.

And, away we go... Define "species."

Z, I would think it enough that you post this bogus argument continuously under your regular alias, that you wouldn't have to start whining about it under this one, too.

Here's another link: http://astrobiology.ucla.edu/pages/res3a.html

Astrology doesn't invoke the supernatural, either. But, it's not science because no experiment can be performed to repeatably confirm any Astrological predictive value with any more accuracy than raw probability would confirm. So what is it exactly that you want? Do you want the AAAS to...

How very Christian of you.

If the logic and tone of your comments were any more "Z" like, I'd say you were both wearing the same shoes at the same time. Arguing with you will be futile, because both of us view each other as willfully ignorant. So, let's not, ok?

Environment is always a factor in evolutionary change -- probably the primary factor. The mutations are random because they are the product of quantum physical atomic interactions which are subject to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, and so cannot be predicted with certainty in advance...

Your post is an example of why ID is not received with any seriousness. You act like ID should be self evident, and that everyone should agree with you. Modern science is all about conducting affirmative experiments, not declaring your opponent's experiments flawed by demanding the absolute...

I was introducing an alternative theory that is at least scientifically possible to illustrate the difference between science and magic -- real science and philisophical masterbation. But, some people need to propagate a theory of existence which permits explanation of why they consistently...

No wonder.

You are misunderstanding the difference between the uncertainty principle, which scientifically demonstrates the unpredictability of the speed and location of sub atomic particles as they strike germ cell DNA molecules, with the uncertainty of the existence of a supernatural designer. The...

Scientifically speaking, we do know, despite your insistence to the contrary, that uncertainty of quantum events causes point mutations, and point mutation is the engine which generates new information required for evolutionary change. There is no "assumption" that uncertainly is "designed."...

As previously stated, I have no concern for your public policy desires. The issue is whether or not ID is scientific. In order for something to be scientific, it must be confirmed by experiment. This means (1) a hypothesis, and (2) a repeatable test that will produce substantially similar...

No evidence of design has been observed. Until someone proves design is a possible factor impacting evolution, there is no reason to set up a test to rule it out. Testing to rule out nothing is not just illogical -- it's silly. Which is what I've been saying since the beginning of the thread.

In your opinion. Not in fact.

In your opinion. If you want to prove it, you'll need to actually conduct real experiments -- not sit in front of the computer declaring your opinions as fact.

Proving chance doesn't disprove design. Design is reality Humans breed dogs, plants, etc. The issue is scientific proof of ID, which requires confirmation by verifiable experiment. The lazy man's way out is to construct logical proofs with unprovable falsifications as a means of avoiding...

Three possible falsifications of chance: (1) simultaneously measure the position and momentum of an electron; (2) find a repeating pattern ithat accounts for the entire spectrum of atmospheric background radiation; (3) measure PI with certainty. OK, your turn. Show us how to falsify design.

Evidently the lack of a physicist among the article's authors is somehow significant, as you've chosen to bold it in your response. But, wait. Two of the four cited articles are co-authored by physicists. So, I guess your failure to see the work of physicists is your failure, and your...