Search results

with due respect this is a matter of freedom, cap. at least in my view. I'm not sure what you and leap are on about as most of the topics on here work in this way: OP posts something controversial, ppl make arguments for or against, and it usually boils down to big govt sympathizers vs people...

what hate talk you tard?

great another irrelevant post from bigarrow, just what ET needed.

I dunno about them policing 'their' areas, I've lived in a couple of minority neighborhoods and while i did catch dirty looks from some of the locals, i never had any problems. Then again it wasn't like the south side of chicago or anything like that. as for the double standard, yeah it is...

what about a mexicans only restaurant, would you care? would you throw temper tantrums and run to the courts to make them open their doors to whites? would you sue? OR would you just go on living your life like a rational person who understands liberty, even though you don't like the result...

so pajama boy, are u suggesting that we should kill off seals, porpoises and dolphins because they are also ENDANGERING the smelt? lol no! you say.. so should people go thirsty 'to save the smelts'? of course not, right, so i guess it's adios for the smelt. and before you try to lecture me on...

+1 good post max. i have yet to hear one conservative on these boards say we don't need ANY regulation.

aside from ignoring what i posted, you are acting like unions somehow restore balance to the universe. What does it matter if capital flows freely in relation to unions? it doesn't. If you work for a company where the owner makes more and more every year, that does NOT entitle you to a bigger...

No. at least not anymore, yes collective bargaining makes sense for employees of a specific company, not unrelated segments of the labor force. unions are economic cancer, and their existence makes no sense. for example wtf does the uaw have to do with card dealers in CT? nothing is correct...

lol, jeezus dude. :D fwiw, JamesL seems to be a conservative, patriotic guy.

not domestically, like someone else said, pretty much all of our regs make our economy more inefficient, and lets face it we have excessive regulation. What we're getting at here is some nations have certain inherent economic/trade advantages relative to us (and some just cheat) at this point...

I'm an American first and a (hardcore) capitalist second. All for free domestic markets, and all for taking advantage of other countries for our benefit.

not a 100% sure, but isn't that what forced toyota/honda etc to set up plants here in the US? They didn't bring all of their employees from japan, they hired Americans, and brought competition to the market. all good.

i figured you would chime in. check this out, you don't support free markets here in the US but you want free trade between nations, even those like china that cheat us, right? you're ass backwards.

If we put up tariffs on china, india etc, our economy would begin to boom as manufacturing made its way back here, they would be fucked but who cares, not me. Then we could loosen up immigration as job demand grows, but what's the benefit of doing it now? If the millions of illegals already...

my 2 cents. I'm with AAA on this issue. I try to avoid labeling myself but without a doubt i most closely align with libertarians (compared to reps or dems), however i fully disagree with their position on immigration as stated in that paper. We are at a point where our economy is near...

here ya go: this post fucking hilarious coming from you. For months all you've done is stroke yourself on here, with the high iq rubbish, acting mega tough by saying stuff like "yea you're right to stay away from me" and "best you don't come to texas you wouldn't fit here" etc., and telling...

im amazed at this thread.. it literally proves the op's point. i have the allegedly atheist troll of the year trying to use the wwjd argument against me (an atheist). we have piehole just making up nonsense, ricter calling tax breaks.. govt subsidies, bigarrow saying he is 'right ' on certain...

some of you in this thread need major work done on your bullshit meters. :D these two were bros, with incognito basically taking martin under his wing. jonathan martin is a two faced rat. richie incognito will be back next year, and neither philban nor any one else should canned over this...

^ ya he seemed to be the only one who really understands, but the other dude who told obama to "just quit" made me laugh.