Search results

From the PM official 'debunking' website (see my comments after this below) "Puffs Of Dust CLAIM: As each tower collapsed, clearly visible puffs of dust and debris were ejected from the sides of the buildings. An advertisement in The New York Times for the book Painful Questions: An Analysis...

For the alternative view from those who do not believe in bomb explosions causing the squibs: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=4 I'll leave it to the reader to decide what makes the most sense to them.

Ok V77, so have you stopped to think about the consequences if it is true that those ARE squibs? Yes, those 'one or two' that your eyeballs have seen. What would that mean for concerned US citizens and relatives of the victims of the attack given that no official government report mentions...

Neophyte, you carry your handle very well. It is your name calling and hatred that is sickening. Are you capable of responding fairly with decent arguments or will you continue with your attacks and lack of substance?

Oh My Gosh... People, take a look at the 'squibs' (explosions to demolition experts) that are highlighted in the video at around 36:25 or so.... That seems like very strong evidence for bomb explosions on the lower floors PRIOR to the upper collapse catching up. Anyone like to comment...

Hi NPP, Don't mean to digress, but was curious to see what happened to your divergence method? Did you give up on it? Thx Maverick

Let's put it this way: you need to earn the right to make big bets which won't threaten your trading existence if you lose. If you can't earn that right by being disciplined and successful with small bets, you will and should never graduate to larger bets. That's what PTJ, Michael Marcus, Tom...

Nitro, There is great value in what you wrote above and the rarity of this advice/approach is what strikes me... Not many know about POP's concepts and even less fully understand/internalize/adopt them when they read them. I reckon that it takes massive pain/blowups/frustration to really...

Hey, I'm not seeing any "100% up room to go $$$ !" comments today, wonder what's going on.... LOL

Other than Livermore's ending which was well publicized, I don't think a lot of people know that Trader Vic blew up in the 90s... apparently by taking on too much risk than he could afford. Overall, I think 5pillars is right on, when you read the success stories, they have a high correlation...

Couldn't agree more or say it any better.

Interest data Gunner, confirms Jeff's thoughts and my suspicions too. Wow, 33% boost to eps growth from stock buybacks?... As the market roars higher I start to wonder if I should think of the USA as a commodity economy and not a tech/services economy, lol. Another point to add, is that...

http://hussmanfunds.com/wmc/wmc061106.htm Some nice data on current S&P valuation in its historical context

I don't know folks... the way I see it, is that I or anyone else could talk all day about this aspect of the fundamentals or that aspect, but ultimately, there's a reason why Jim Simons is the #1 hedge fund manager in the world, besting Soros and other more fundamentally based managers. Simons...

The pundits' comments that, hey things are just 'stabilizing' and will 'quickly come back' are eerily reminiscent of pre tech bubble implosion commentary to me... GDP growth came in at 1.6% last qtr, people will soon be reminded that the multiplier effect works as viciously backwards that it...

Jeff, I think you've identified a key driver behind the p/e multiple compression that's shown up over the last 5 years... Look at HD, INTC, BBBY, YHOO stock then and now for instance for a good idea. And then look at the charts for XOM, PD, CAT and BA in comparison... I don't see how all 3...

Extensive research huh? Lol. http://www.worldvision.org/about_us.nsf/child/why_donate?Open&lid=why_donate&lpos=body But wait, I guess you will come back and say that you have extensively researched the AUDITED financial statements at worldvision (which show that 87% of revenue goes towards...

Your logic is deeply flawed. You use the either or fallacy and expect everyone to have an aha moment. Could it be that God does not speak directly to humans today because they are so hard of heart that even if He were to appear to them in person they still would not believe? Could it be that God...

Lkh, Show me where I have attacked anyone as inferior to myself in this thread. I haven't, but again, you throw off ad hominem attacks when you can't say anything else. I state my belief. If you don't like it or agree, that is your prerogative as a human being. You can say so freely. But...