Search results

that's funny... because even with your own journal, you seem to need more attention, so you go to other journals to post. hmmm.. jimmie seemed to suffer from the same complex, always needed to be the centre of attention.

I would say so... but the bigger problem is that you had to lie about how you've just started trading and change your name from jimmie barton. I guess people would have been less tolerant of you under your jimmie name, so you got yourself a few days of interested readers. But now that the cat...

@Sweet Bobby Bobby... I don't have all that much experience with options, but from what I do know, fills can really be a bitch. You've been forward trading this for quite a while with what looks to be good success (until of course the steamroller comes), but I do think it would be quite...

I'm sorry, but who are you exactly with your 6 days posting history? LOL

Yes, they are different things, I agree, and if he wanted to reach some accredited status, then I would imagine all of this would be important. But isn't that Emmet guy a proven fraud? I have no idea about any this. But here is what I do know. Anytime here at ET we have someone who starts to...

I'm a bit confused by the way you are doing your stats, but that's ok cause only you need to understand it. But here is what I do see. You say if its zero, it means it went the other way, hence not in your intended direction, and hence this would be a losing trade hitting some sort of stop...

LOL... you clearly have no clue, and the fact you just signed up days ago means there is no point in trying to have a discussion or argument with you. For anyone else reading, notice there are no links to posts provided where he said he was a vendor or trying to get people to go to his site.

As has been pointed out, link to the exact thread where he in the slightest way even hints at being a vendor or offering any teaching material. When you can't find it, because you won't, the discussion will be over.

First of all.. I have to really wonder if after you do your SIM trading, if you will really be able to trade 3 contracts of CL. This thing whipsaws like crazy and you can be down hundreds of dollars on only one contract in seconds. Assume it goes against you 30 cents... at 3 contracts, you'd...

Now that I have read the thread, there probably isn't much to discuss anyway. It seems like wrbtrader made his points you didn't present any convincing evidence.

I join the ranks of 99% of the other members on here who have gone through countless other aliases. Its a rite of passage. :) I do commend you for hanging onto yours for so long, but at the same time, since I haven't seen you post a single thing about trading in the past 5 pages of your...

Wow... I just saw this now and I'm sorry Baron, but this is a new low. You clearly have no problem with any yahoo on here making outrageous claims, but you pick on someone who has very clearly documented his trading for years? If you went to any trouble to see what he is doing (ie. logging...

Great, thanks for the update. I only asked because TopHat, when he made a call that was very firm, couldn't quite live up to the fact that price did in fact go higher than the level he said it never would cross again. So I just wanted to know if all the other calls in this thread were going...

Did you take that NQ long call you made here? https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/we-have-topped.304514/page-12#post-4364044 I ask because at the time you posted this, NQ would have been around 4846 lets say, with a low of 4836.50. But it did end up going as low as 4830.25, which would...

Considering you just called for a market top here, and then it broke higher, why should we believe you this time? It only took an hour for the market to print new highs and prove you wrong. https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/we-have-topped.304514/page-5#post-4362803

Thank you for making an official post on this. I think you're completely wrong about this, but I know that what is good for me, and most people trying to learn after all, is not good for the website. If posts could be vetted for accuracy, the traffic would slow down to a crawl. I have...

I tend to disagree. If the post is so good, it actually has something tangible that really stands out, or some proof behind the claim. I agree that other traders don't care to educate, which is totally fine, it isn't their job or their requirement to, but then just STFU. It never helps to...

The thing though is that this website is not meant to be some trash talking National Enquirer type of website where you expect that everything posted is going to be fake and photoshopped. If I come here with the expectation that everything is going to be a joke and fake, might as well not come.

Sounds like someone doesn't get it. Its all about trying to make something better, hence why this was posted in the feedback forum. I'm hoping @Baron sees it and comments. I really couldn't care less about what Handle posts or doesn't post, but when there is the potential to suppress...

If you read my past few posts you will find them. Essentially, he makes it sound like he just came up with yet another system that targets and risks only ticks here and there via the DOM. The thing is that in the ES, there are so many flushes, his "rules" of soft and hard 3 or 4 tick stops...