Search results

I agree .

Why wouldn't a person of faith utilize these things? In my opinion, the error you Darwin Dudes make is assuming that Bible Boyz divorce "science" from the Creator. Far from it, most Bible Boyz understand "science" as the visible footprint of the Creator and as a blessing for mankind when...

OK.......stu in league with Christianity........I am going to go look out the window, as I think the world may be ending.......:D

I readily acknowledge that what we call science cannot, nor should it, be able to verify the existence of G-D. If, from my perspective, any of the creation could verify the Creator, then that would be a larger problem. Creation occured before man, according to Genesis. We have a wide gulf that...

Well vhehn, at the risk of my diminishing your kind remarks, it is not a conspiracy per se, it is sort of like when one political party has a "super majority", they can lock their opponents out of the process, for no other reason than they can. But I greatly appreciate the fleeting...

Exactly. Academia = big money. Evolutionists in academia must protect the turf on which they feed themselves. Unlike the "saga" they promote, no competition is allowed.

This is the same individual and critique that your compadre linked, so my remarks would be similar. However, since I have the paper that Mr. Lindsay's site is "debunking", allow me to cite this passage from the introduction: "....It is the purpose of this paper to examine some of the...

That seems rather "dogmatic"...........

Strange that the supposed "debunking" was by a faculty member from the same university where Mr. Boylan received numerous faculty awards. Maybe the university needs to be debunked. I dont need to google him, I have some of his work in front of me.

Hah! I like your style...........

From reading some of your other comments, I assumed you were a Darwinist, if not, then I offer my apology. It would seem I should apologize also regarding the level of your knowledge regarding thermodynamics and order development, as it would appear by your critique of Mr. Boylan that you...

Ah yes, "true scientist", well I guess that settles the matter.............

It would also seem that most cable tv viewers believe that CNN and MSNBC wreak of flatulence, therefore,.............

vhehn, I have read some of your other posts on subjects other than religion, from which I have gotten the impression that you are an intelligent person. Such a blanket bias that your above statement casts, seems to be beneath you. I have Mr. Boylan's paper in front of me and it is a very...

I did not know that, but are you saying that is a disqualification ? If you googled him, then I assume you saw his eminent faculty awards at Iowa State University.

It was the high priest of your religion that stated "..The highest possible stage in moral culture is when we recognize that we ought to control our thoughts..", which in this case, controlling our thoughts keeps us from sticking ones' foot in ones' mouth. I quote David R. Boylan,Ph.D...

That would fall under the "Change" catagory, which keeps his campaign promise tracker at a perfect 1733 campaign promises made vs. 1733 campaign promises kept. "Hope" to see everyone at the polls this coming November.

O777, you have to admit that is funny........

This has been the gnostic tune from the start. Secret knowledge of the truth that only a small few of humanity could attain, or needed to be attained through an enlightened pneumatic.

Well I must be a dope, as I cant see the difference between Mr. Obama breaking established decorum by castigating the work of a co-equal branch of government in a SOTU speech, and the rude act of Mr. Wilson which took place during a mundane address to congress by Mr. Obama. From your remarks...