Search results

LMAO..... DeMartini started working there after the '93 bombing...

________________________________________ And then there are numerous references in numerous docs that mention how office space was extended into the core wherever the elevator shaft was shorter. ________________________________________ the mit has put that to rest. mind u also fema/nist...

More inconsistencies in your links.... From http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html#anchor1149808 The design was a "tube in a tube" construction where the steel reinforced, cast concrete interior tube, was surrounded with a structural steel framework configured as another tube with the load...

Where to begin - Ok, algoxy.com makes a rather poor case for the concrete, honestly. The best evidence seems to be sunlight shining through the building, showing the hallways. But even funnier is the second link you give. It starts right off in the second para under The Structural System...

Hey, if you can't prove it........

Where am I wrong?

Oops, I made a mistake and gave the page number given to the doc by Adobe. 01-16-07 08:20 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote from Bitstream: I am an ignorant dumb fuck, full of crap and hatred...

To summarize for WTC 1 - On pg 71/298, final report, just below figure 2-2: On floors 95-96, 15-18 perimeter columns were severed and 5-6 core columns were severed, with 1-3 core columns heavily damaged. WTC 2- On pg90/278, final report, just below figure 3-3 : On floors79-81, 15...

Actually, he's approaching troll status

it was surrounded by concrete, Lie..... the plane impact didn't damage the main supports Lie..... the towers were built with multiple plane crashes in mind. Lie.... What a disgusting piece of filth you are....

So I see you've conceded the point about the core being covered in concrete all the way to the top. Almost there grasshopper.....

I think you're absolutely correct on your outrage. Pits are a strong willed, aggressive, and quick to attack, no doubt about it. But I think the true problem lies with the owners' inability to control a strong breed, and their capacity to rationalize away that kind of behavior in their...

Comprehension problems abound in you, son.... What does it matter WHO runs the site, the site is just a compiler of resources. The people giving the opinion are identified, in every case,THAT'S what matters. I guess you don't get that. If you're too dogmatic in your beliefs to read an...

A govt sponsored link? Prove it. Otherewise it's all crap assumptions, since I also wouldn't want to expose my id to all these CT nutterz. You ask, what's he got to hide, well, how about what's he got to lose... So now the black, smoky fires, which you used as evidence to back the claim that...

Honestly, I have no idea why you keep saying I'm quoting PM, when I'm not. And you have proven NOTHING regarding the links. It's all just a desperate attempt to preserve your little world where the boogeyman is the big bad govt. LMAO....... I'm providing links from debunking 9/11 and 9/11...

and then Bit says... "it's YOU now carrying the burden of proof to highlight what has been misquoted and quote mined. prove that relevant material contains false premises and information otherwise zip it. " Here's a fine example of YOU believing some thing that has been taken out of...

Again, it's your OPINION that the links , etc aren't honest in their assessment of 9/11. And all because YOU don't want to believe it. Your beliefs mean nothing, son, it's what you can prove. And here's the problem , at it's heart, that I have with so many of the CT'ers claims - I find the...

LOL..... FYI - I've never even read the PM article, so I have no idea what you're talking about.... And how do you know that I've swallowed EVERY thing that I've read supporting the official version? You don't now, do you? The truth is, I haven't.. And you think I'm a hypocrite? By...

C'mon, you're smarter than that..... Try again...

Wrong again,dipshit.... http://wtc.nist.gov/NISTNCSTAR1-3.pdf