Search results

Is it out already? Been wanting to see this. Even FOX NEWS gave it a rave review.

Here's what I caught of the market today. Those two crazy volume bars on my chart are due to QT crashing then, not a data feed problem.

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1492608#post1492608 Go there for some good resources pertaining to gaussians.

My thoughts are that that is an FTT alright, but not by much. There will probably be another 1 or 2 attempts on the LTL at least before the trend rolls over. A "weak," or "close" ftt like that I would lean towards considering a sign of change more on the traverse level than on the channel level.

You are suggesting that at the time, the 12:25 bar be considered a flaw instead of an FTT. If this were the case we would see increasing black on the next bar, I think. What actually happened is on the red bar we saw the decr red we wanted but on the following black bar we had very low...

If you want to review, I suggest reviewing all of the digests that have been posted in this thread. If you haven't already encountered them (?) try doing a search for my screen name and "*spyfut*". Also search for "gaussian video". Good luck.

A truly valiant first effort! If I may offer a suggestion for the future... Try matching up your gaussians more with the price movement (dominant, non dominant, etc) rather than strictly the color/height of the volume bars. Good trading to you, Pr0crast

Had to do most of today in hindsight. Looked pretty nice.

Look at the YM gaussians. Also look at the ES gaussians in such a way that lets you "see inside" the 12:25 bar. <img src="http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1491476">

Hi guys, The way I usually look at it is there are two prominent flavors of FTT. There are the forest FTTs, where a dominant traverse, as a whole, fails to make it to its pre-established LTL. If there is a volatility expansion, there can only be this kind of FTT after an actual retrace...

I usually ignore this type of post, but here I find myself making one of my own... Two left charts are QT (probably w/ IB), and two right charts are esignal and QC. Don't think it would have affected any trades, but still should make anyone using esig/qc think twice about paying $100+/mo...

Spy, do you pay attention to flaws on the YM for signals of change/cont, or does that not fall within the constructs of "sufficiency"?

More than half the bars were "extreme" volume...

Not too surprising, considering 1 in 25 Americans are right there with you.

QFT. As always, thanks for your patience in addressing my question.

I really wouldn't worry about it as there are no differences on your charts that would affect a trade one way or another. The same events unfold, but if your computer is 1 second slow in processing a bar may be a different color or close on an uptick instead of a downtick. The data feed is fed...

fubar, Forgive me if I don't respond to you as I can only see your messages as quoted by others. I just wanted to note how ironic that it is that you speak of the "mental state" of Jack/Spyder when you yourself suffer from a number of fairly well known maladies. Obsession An influence...

Your pink RTL (my orange) was broken on increasing black volume. Thus your red channel (my dotted channel) is just a fanned out version of your pink channel using a recycled PT3, which I thought was only done when the RTL breaks on DECR volume. My updated chart (dotted lines are your chan)...

Spy, I had a hard time finding the gaussians to justify that channel. If a channel is not backed up by gaussians, what does it represent other than S/R from those individuals who also drew the mechanical channel?

Lighten up, yo. Listen to your post count