Search results

As they say: No position is a position, too ... :) ~Scientist

Financially - Yes. Mentally - No.

Hey man - I was down -$80 bucks / 0.08k today in total! Lost heaps on the stocks, just balanced it out on the futures (ES-up 1.8k) - If I hadn't had the +4.6k-day yesterday scalping NTES etc, I would've taken a holiday to europe or sth... Gives me goosebumps, this job sometimes... :p

Yeah the ES were the only market I found halfway tradeable today. If specialists / MM's annoy you - there's always the futures... But then, even the ES just didn't give us many opp's. DB, DT, entered too late exited too early... few short-term scalps... Must've been nervous today - probably...

I'm afraid it's not just happening on the NYSE... :( NAS, ES - Everything is choppy... I got shaken out of the tree several times today... Bastards... Certainly won't place physical stops into the market anymore on days like these... Must've been the worst trading day for 3 weeks or...

Yeah. Sounds somewhat familiar... :D Have Fun, Phoenix! Peace, ~Scientist.

Well, phoenix, aren't you lucky that posing doesn't require the ability to trade? :)

LOL. You're just not getting the point. Your opinions are unbalanced and lack full manifestation. Since your statements are contradictory, they're shallow and without essence. They aren't rock solid manifestations of truth gathered by experience, thus you will fail for you cannot stand in the...

Aaah... At least somebody who understands at least the basics of how markets work. Very much unlike phoenix :) Seems to be one of phoenix's issues. Maybe he should consider some professional help... :cool: -Hmmm, phoenix? ~Scientist

LOL - Now you're REALLY making a fool of yourself : This isn't what I was talking about. I never argued that a price changes across timeframes. All I said is that the timeframes have an effect on each other. YOU - And right now you're trying to distract - Negated yourself TWICE in the same...

UR right axeman. No neural nets were used for Deep Blue. However, they're to my knowledge becoming standard in good chess programs these days, and most can outperform every chessplayer. My great admiration to you for your observation and to Kasparov for his amazing mind, being able to beat...

ROFL :p Can I requote your quote on this very board from 5 minutes ago?? HAHAHA. - I'm not setting up strawmen - You're setting yourself up as a jester! Get a life man - Even a phoenix can only burn so many times... :D ~Scientist

Well phoenix, I'll have to disagree with you disagreeing with me! :p When I'm trading the ES, for example, this seems to work very well for me, enabling me to capture an average of 1.5-3.5, mostly 2-3 points a day - per contract, that is. I don't care whether you think there can't be...

Finally somebody who's got a grip on this... And I thought I was all alone... :) Besides, people's motivations for acting on price - a MA can serve as a reversal signal if the deviation is too large and seems exhausted / overextended, but it can at the same time also serve as a...

Yes, TM - And this is what drives the stock; The market is simply a chaotically controlled mind hive of market participants and differing opinions participating in an orchestrated, anarchistic, orgy of price discovery. :) ~Scientist

LOL. And I thought you were a position trader indahook? No fundy's there? :D Try this: 1. Find a random NASDAQ stock with a beta of 3 or higher. 2. Bring it up on the screen (Lv2, 1,3,5,10-min chart, arbitrary) 3.Find a die with 6 sides and roll it. 3. If die# <4 then...

LOL. I've read them man! :D ... Be nice if you could extract a few quotes.... ~Scientist

LOL. Since I can't stop laughing about the CTFC's stupidity, I just thought why not come up with a counter-theory? I say that rather than Technical Analysis, Fundamental analysis is bullshit! Why? Because Technical Analysis Doesn't - Can't - Won't lie. It tells you EXACTLY what's going on...

It's not difficult, it just needs to factor in all the varieties and idiosyncracies of people's discretionary playing. The problem is that a computer will always do the BEST thing, while a human will do what he FEELS or thinks from EXPERIENCE has worked best in the bast - Almost like genetic...