Search results

Me: > ... you have established yourself either as a >simple (minded) troll, or a total idiot. And in your case, there is no question as to the catagory(s) to which you belong. JB

There is no longer any doubt -- with your above question you have established yourself either as a simple (minded) troll, or a total idiot. I don't draw much of a distinction between the two. JB

Sorry, but having been raised in just such a compound you couldn't be more wrong. Getting your "tight pussied fuk bitches" pregnant is part of the plan -- it's all about control (and making more tight pussied fuk bitches). JB

T: > ... not even being able to keep your own brand >of logic internally consistent. I feel bad for people who are unable to even square their own beliefs with their own beliefs. It becomes pointless. JB

V00: >Seems to me if there is no God, and no heaven >then why are you wasting your precious time >trying to convince others? It should not matter >what others think as long as you are happy. On ET ... pure entertainment. With friends ... I hate to see them waste their time and would...

V00: >Even if proof was shown, atheist would not admit it ... The conundrum: How does the above square with "there are no atheists in foxholes" routine that you theists throw around? JB

Projection. The atheists I've know have shown to a person far more willingness to bend to new evidence that *any* theist I've met. Remember, the atheists are not carrying a conclusion in search of facts. (of course with your twisted mind you'll still ask someone to prove a negative...

All this discussion of agnostic vs atheism got me thinking: Many of my friends are atheist. I am the only agnostic (that I know of) in the immediate group. I'm trying to find any substantive differences. We live our lives exactly the same -- that is, I (and every other agnostic that I...

Again, not defending these particular tactics, but I'm not convinced there is much of a parallel. It's a matter of practicality -- here, if you can get a solid legal reason to get in and do the tests(and I'm not sure they have one), with DNA you can easily determine scores or perhaps hundreds...

Perfect agreement. JB

Agreed, but that answer doesn't address the question in any way. I'm simply interested in whether AAA considers old guys getting young girls repeatedly pregnant 'harmlessly minding their own business'. JB

AAA: >These people were minding their own >business, harming no one. I think they've f**k*d this one up from a legal standpoint if they can't even fine the "informant", BUT ... Let's suppose there truly are 16yo girls there with as many as 4 kids. Let's suppose the DNA results show...

Joab: >I now have a close friend that is a Minister at a hospital >and she tells me that on the death bed even the most >cynical convert and accept God. Does she go to hell for lying? Only the completely delusional believe that everyone "accepts god" on their death bed. That statement...

Not following your train of thought here Rearden. I don't find it laughable that someone might think that the moon would have the stronger pull as TGreg implied -- with the effect of the moon on the tides, that's not a really hard mistake to make. What I found just hysterical is that...

TG: >They are asking something very much like which >body's gravity is the strongest on Earth. kut2: >Or does a "genius" like you actually think the moon >has a stronger pull on the earth than the sun?? :D ROFLAO! OWNED!! JB

EDIT: The last sentence about should read: I have no doubt that you will now turn it "off". JB

Me: >You have NO IDEA what more "treasure" (remember, >treasure is metaphorical here) would do for you -- it >could change your life in ways you never imagined. V00: >And so could God. A: You really need to make up your mind whether your going to stick with your "opportunity cost"...

VOO: >And who makes up the tests for planets ? We can used "commonly accepted" definition (as I proposed), or you and I can create and agree our own -- it makes no difference to me. It's the point that we *can test* and collect results that is being made here. >Now you are gonna tell...

V00: >I know what my opportunity cost is. >What is yours ? Since you haven't dug every claim, you *can't possibly* know what your lost opportunity costs are. All you know is hubris. >I already have all the treasure I need on earth, I'm happy for you, but that is an arbitrary...

>Who knows in a 1000 mores years, science >will say we were wrong, there are no planets >only asteroids. Perhaps. For those that care about truth, that's the beauty of science -- it continues to find it's errors and correct them based on current knowledge. Religion on the other hand...