Search results

At first sight, I'd say the most likely is that the 2nd cell of Routine in Modrian table is linked to 2nd down row cell on Move Reverseal table, and the same for 3rd cell in Routine of the Modrian Table and the 3rd down row cell on move Reversal. It's more likely to me just because of the...

Nice to see new people in here. Welcome and good luck for your journey @sd2005 What's your native language ? It will a lot! In terms of logging, from where I am I can say yes. @Sprout could surely answer providing more details. But yes, dominance in terms of volume is increasing volume...

= You have 16 out of 16 cells that match in structure, and 12 out of 16 cells that match in color. Does not mean 16 - 12 = 4 that do not HAVE color, but 4 that do not MATCH in color. While I'm thinking more about this to fix the color issue, I drew my Move Reversal table

I've just finished to read all your 14 messages from last Saturday's night. Thank you so much for this contribution to all of you ! I need a little break of some hours, cause the last thing I'm on, which is the issue with the colors on Move Rev is bothering me a bit. Need to eat something and a...

I love that

Got you very well. Thanks a lot for this very important contribution. All your words, either consideration and contribution, are a huge thing for me. Thank you very much for helping me with all this differenciation @Simples

Thank you ;)

I had already understood all the above, and this was VERY VERY VERY nice, important and good from you and for me to have it reminded. It cleans even more things in my mind. That's a kind of "iterative strengthening" Thanks a LOT @tiddlywinks !

This looses me a bit. "You have 16 out of 16 cells that match in structure" -> starting from scratch, I must find something that sticks to the number 16. What does correspond to 16 ? I'd say here if on Modrian table I consider each differently colored top row zone so each FS, I'd say there are...

Another thank you ;) I understand you lol

Thank you very much

I love this

While doing so, a coloring issue surged. Here it is : NB : Ignore the interrogations points on Modrian Table. As seen with the black rays starting from Modrian table and pointing to the Move Reversals one, some colors are obvious to establish a correspondance from a table to the other one...

+ = NB : I took here the liberty to insert the FTT label inside the short container, to stick to the "each pt1 of any trend is inside the prior one"; and I also changed the color of the Pt1 of the long container which is on the original image in red, to green, to stick to the color of the...

WOW ! I take a one day break, and around 15 messages posted already... impressive ! You guys are really active, strong and hardly willing. I love that. Thank you for all your contribution that I'll read and explore granularly tomorrow ;) a huge THANK YOU to you three. Take highly care of all...

So, P is assigned or P1 is assigned ? Hmmm.. I may be missing something. I see Pt1 of the long channel on a volume peak, then on B2B volume creates a trough as price BO prior RTL after ftt, and when B2B ends to lead to dec 2R, therefore volume creates a peak. If we say the volume OOE's...

Working today on all this, and reready fully the Journal in question. I had already read it a several times in the last 4 years, and the first time I read it was the very first thing I read about JH universe. A long way has been browsed since that first moment. And it's very exciting to note...

In this resides something crucial apparently : trough -> increasing -> peak -> trough. No mention of decreasing. Why so ? Why not better : increasing-> peak-> decreasing -> trough and so on ? Any comment would be appreciated here.

ok got you, thank you :) My interpretation of what you talk about. :strong:, Thank you. And so must be yours, without a doubt. Thanks for the advice, got you ;)

Gonna sleep now, I'm done for today ^^ :confused: Take all care of you, see you tomorrow ;)