Search results

1256 contracts is MTM. Why do you want to qualify as a trader? To take a bigger loss than 3K?

What is the other source? Did you publish a new book? Is it available from Barnes and Noble?

Shoe: Jesus clearly stated divorce, just one thing in the bible, but you interpreted it as many things. I I really don't see how clear it was stated that many tihing were allowed in the Old Testament because of the people simply were not ready. Is that your own interpretation? Jesus...

I agree with you. You are the very few who try to support their statements with evidence. I think you have convinced me that there are incorrect statements in the bible.

I never said it existed. I actually don't know. I am curious how one can prove that unicorns didn't exist with scientific methods.

Since you like debating, may I ask the following question just for fun? How can one prove that unicorns never existed, and worldwide flood never happened?

Please provide a link. Thank you.

I probably don't understand the rigid definition of science very well. Though my own opinion is that a hypothesis can only be disproved without uncertainty(HH might disagree because of the his uncertainty principle), my experience (probably with junk science) is that most scientific papers try...

I didn't try to twist your words intentionally. I don't have a rigid standard to test "Bible is inerrant". I mentioned in my previous post that I don't know any rigid standard. How come you think I have one. Indeed I don't think we have a rigid standard that everyone here will accept and so...

I have seen many so called high standard academic papers that manipulate the statistical data or evidence to support their hypothesis. I don't know there is a rigid test standard accepted by all scientists. Please educate me the rigid test standard. I myself is not a rigid scientist. If...

Depends on the evidences of chronological inconsistencies. Some inconsistencies can be explained and some not. Please write down the inconsistencies so everyone can be his/her own judge.

It might be a good idea to have a new thread of "The definition of God, or what is God". It might turn out that someone will consider natural evolution/randomness is a god.

is that a way to influence the fed decision?

Good. Now we have the same belief in science. Let me rephrase my question. Assume "Bible is inerrant". Can we scientifically prove that it is wrong? (That is what I call hard evidence.)

Good point here. They can't be proved true. Am i right?

I just wanted to point out there is degree of certainty/uncertainty in "my" belief system. I live in a real life with uncertainty that I do need a belief system for me to make a reasonable decision in some situations.

HH: You are indeed an agnostic. This type of logic or argument serves no significance to evidence. Without true scientfic method of proving or disproving it, we need to have some "indirect" methods of increasing or decreasing the significance of the hypothesis. I used to enjoy this...

kj, have you ever thought of the possibility that God is not almighty.

You are right. Sometimes I think God is not "perfect" according to my inperfect opinion. I like your arguments so far, and really appreciate your input here.