Search results

Prove it.... Link please....

Naaaaah, we don't HAVE to.... But I'm taking a break from fixing my backyard waterfall, and it's fun OWNING a dork like Ratturd..... But seriously ZZ, what do you think of the dishonesty of misquoting, quoting out of context, and partially quoting the firefighters that were THERE on 9/11...

I guess you missed this reply..... OWNED again...... BTW, still waiting for YOUR links..... But you can't provide them can you? Because you're just making it up as you go..... OWNED yet again....

No mass, eh? What about the falling steel? Even if you were right about the concrete turning to dust INSTANTANEOUSLY, wouldn't the steel from the stories above have sufficient MASS to collapse the floors? OWNED again........

Eloquently put.... I think I'll wait for Ratturd to post a link backing his 90% assertion before I reply to him again. For there's no sense discussing anything with someone that's been OWNED!!!!!

Wow, you're a psychic too. Now you say what I think? LMAO, what an idiot... BTW, still waiting for links to your claims. "The resaerch is out there" according to you. So let's see it. Otherwise, one word can describe you ...... OWNED !!

Scooped out? Firehouse: Did that chief give an assignment to go to building 7? Boyle: He gave out an assignment. I didn’t know exactly what it was, but he told the chief that we were heading down to the site. Firehouse: How many companies? Boyle: There were four engines and at...

So I take it you're like that guy in the Penn and Teller video that said that "NOBODY can convince me....." In other words, you're NOT a real skeptic, are you? Just politically motivated by your anti-war stance...

Let's see some links to that 90% claim.....

Let's see some links backing your opinion......

This helps explain the difference between the 2 views - In short, CT'ers ignore relavant info, and openly distort what is available. Plain dishonesty, IMHO. 1.6 What is Good Science? For me, good science is far more than accurate science. ‘Accurate representation’ for...

Answer this - Just above this post I ask about the "3 small fires" that the conspiracy theorists say were present at WTC 7. Different photos and videos show otherwise, and were available to them when they fabricated their own theories... Why would they leave out any reference to these...

And since you're always so hot about WTC 7..... Do you still say that there were only 3 small fires???? http://www.911myths.com/WTC7_Smoke.avi Find this link at http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm To find firefighters quotes and more photos

Talk about embarassing..... www.debunking911.com/jones.htm

Squibs explained..... www.debunking911.com/overp.htm

go right ahead

Exactly - Slick Willy's private life and the shit it caused him brings this into light perfectly......

So then it should be easy for you to knock it down, point by point. Let's see what you've got, other than your beliefs.

It's just that you're embarassing yourself with your CT theories. www.debunking911.com www.911myths.com

LOL More pfffffft from Stu....