Search results

OMG, I thought it was a deep fake until I saw it on skynews. Here's the rest of the speech if anyone's interested:

Lol, a diplomat... I see. I won't worry then, since your politics seem to reward all decision making; rather than good decision making. Then again, reality comes knocking in unexpected ways.

Are you saying opposing viewpoints are not allowed or that you just don't agree?

Fill in the blanks, you could say the same thing about everyone in gubment. "If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary." -Federalist No. 51, James Madison Around around we go.

If you're not long UUP then exercising the put would leave you short. Odd that the borrow is 0 but... it's a canned response triggered by a broad condition. The borrow rate info is merely convenience. Schwab can't pay programmers/engineers to write more conditionals and queries than...

I've consulted the judges and they are, albeit reluctantly, willing to accept this as the correct answer. However, the grand prize has be replaced with a picture of the grand prize instead. Congrats to @Tuxan anyway: Q. MSDNC exists, so why shouldn't RT? A. Because Merrick Garland wants to...

I'm surprised you can't provide the answer... I mean we've had some pretty lengthy conversations. You must have some idea of my political viewpoint. I've even dropped strong hints in this very thread. It should be a cakewalk. Either the audience is too proud to humor the judges, completely...

Your discontent is noted.

Don't hate the player, hate the game. The judges note that the audience is starting to sound like a spoiled child.

The judges caution that your disqualification for nitpicking is currently under review. In addition, those organizations have taken donations from many unknown actors.

It's already known that the organizations listed above are foreign sponsored and paying pundits for their opinion. There's no way to tell their intentions toward the U.S. nor how much (or little) influence they have. We only know they're looking out for themselves. Therefore, these answers...

So your answer is... since they did it we should too? The judges inform me that's not correct, or at least not what they're looking for. Perhaps you can be more precise. The prize remains up for grabs.

In all seriousness, let's nix the games, insults, appeals to authority, non-sequiturs, false dilemmas, and usual logical fallacies. BBC exists, CBC exists, NPR, PBS, Australian public broadcasting, so on, so forth. I'm sure the great savior of democracy, Kamala Harris - who I'm definitely...

IDK how your inability to provide a good answer applies to my intelligence, but... OK. So, who cares? FOX news is also pro Trump, should we ban them too? I thought that was Kamala's job?

You're saying I stumped you? No "phone a friends" Tux!

Is that a picture of your brain exploding Tux? ;) Simple question deserves a simple answer. You claim to be a clear thinking person, able to see thru bulls*%t, right? You don't believe everything you see on the news or read on the net. Do you? So... I'll give you a few more tries before I post...

You're saying the reason RT should be silenced and shouldn't exist is because the Russians support Harris? What if they supported Trump instead? Then RT can exist?

That's moot.... answer the question: MSDNC exists, so why shouldn't RT?

The Justice Department has seized more than 30 web domains that it said were part of a broader, ongoing, surreptitious effort by the Russian government to influence the 2024 U.S. election and American public opinion, federal authorities announced Wednesday. read full story

Biden/Harris have done an admirable job of it. Yay tariffs, not!