Search results

Tums: hopefully I can redeem myself for previous lame posts.:D <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1824060>

I should have used the word "variation" instead of "combination". Each of Avi 8's four Jokari matrix illustrations indicated price volatility acting in harmony with volume expansion/contraction. I attempted to put out for discussion the opposite case of each, which I located below the...

how about 4 more combinations? <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1822547>

not sure what you are getting at here. Could you please provide a link or other reference to this post? Thanks

note that 11:05 spent over 3 minutes as a Forming Pennant which requires using the YM for signals during this period.

you really have to review these topics in the futures journal. I can tell by your question you haven't absorbed Spyder's excellent posts about these topics.

Let's go back to the basic principle of why we use the YM. We understand the YM leads the ES at times of change. So we have defined guidelines of when to use the YM based on times of change only, to eliminate over trading. Let me pose some questions: Is a lateral breakout a time of change...

Jeez, looks like you guys had more fun last night than I did at the party I went to. Just getting caught up on all of the great posts. Bi9: I would like to debate this point. The 12:30 ES bar remained ON THE LINE (lower lateral horizontal trend line) therefore I disagree with your statement. So...

Tums posted edited versions of the two chat sessions. The first was 1/29 and second was 2/1. Look back in the journal for these. edit: you can also go to the ET Chat page and request today's log. Then edit the date in the log url to any date you want.

Spy: in recent discussions with a fellow student of this thread we seem to be at odds regarding the "dwell time" one can/must spend on the YM after an ES VE. I had the impression that one's permission would be lifted after the ES VE bar closed and until another VE was made by a subsequent bar...

perhaps you know this trick, but put the flamers on ignore and it will cut down the # of posts.

I can see that, but let's take it methodically, a little bit at a time until there is understanding. Why not re-do the 23 bar area I originally referenced first. I am tight on time right now, but I will PM you and we can work this out later. In the mean time perhaps others will chime in.

Why not take one at a time and fix the first one before considering others. You have already posted three days:)

I know you understand the dominant trend direction, but your annotations in the bars I referenced are reversed. Don't do anything else with these until you see this. Think about the volume trend over the entire traverses annotated by your channels. The left side of the Gaussian ( / ) is the...

Callmate, as a start please look very close at what you have described on the first 23 bars from the Gaussian perspective. Do you really believe that the dominant trend direction is up? If not, then ask yourself how would describe the true dominant direction on your Gaussians in a way that...

ok, this is what I was thinking, while just keeping with ES, YM and volume for tools. I am assuming a medium resolution level. 1) The context is a down trending channel so for price to continue lower we must have increasing dominant (red) volume as price makes lower lows to anticipate...

Two questions as of the close of the last bar in your snip: 1)what is the current mode? 2)where must you go in your sweep in the next instant and why?

My thanks also goes out to Spy for again generously contributing way beyond what should ever have been expected of him. I have been reviewing some of Spy's recent posts after returning from NYC and would like to emphasize what WGTrader said above. Additionally, Avi8 and TikiTrader have...

I realized this at ~10:31 and exited seconds after this screen shot (taken automatically on the minute) as the pennant broke out upward. I was also concerned that the very low volume of the retrace would lead to a flaw.

If FTT = point 1. What must come next before RTL BO?