Search results

The idea of the AIG is that not the government who helped them but they have helped the government by accepting the bailout money to prevent the whole economy from collapsing and therefore they think that they deserve the bonuses. In my opinion, it was a poor judgment of the chairman anyway...

Under the circumstances, the judgment of the AIG chairman to pay bonus is in question.

You're just telling us your own story indeed. Now my question is, did you share the same idea as Harper or not? If no, then I have nothing to say and sorry for my misunderstanding. If yes, then I already answered to your question and it's up to you to understand it correctly.

No, I don't change the subject. I think you got it as I already answered your question in the previous post that you share the same idea as Harper but for different purpose.

Yep, the reason I mention him because Jack is a good "friend" of Trader666. :D

Listen super m____ [ to be completed by you ], I'm not detail-oriented as you to compare thing words by words, but I compare the idea as a whole. You seemed to be at the side of pointing the fault to US consumers, right? Or unless I misunderstood your idea. Harper as well, but he was just...

Every moron think that others are moron. As expected, I was sure you will use that word. So thanks. You're a such predictable personality. :D

Seems like you can't even understand your own writing. Review your own posts, it mentioned about your blame to US consumers. Go hump Jack Hershey's leg. :D

What's wrong with you today?

INCREASEnow, the best and effective attack wasn't a direct or a serious one but the one camouflaged through a joke. That way the target person can't really counter-attack since it's a joke.

If you think that Harper blamed US consumers for nothing as you do then you're wrong. Harper is a smart guy to take the opportunity to promote his party values but also his objective is to build a good relation with US. The blame was not to US consumers as specific but to the...

The reason behind is all about eventual election or promoting the Conservative Party which he is currently the big boss. If you read the document, it mentioned that the unconservative idea had lead to the problem that we are facing right now. In other words, "vote for Conservative is safe...

I agree with you for the fact that nobody can know ahead what will happen. The point is that Cramer had behaved as someone who know ahead with his many calls and therefore he got reality check, the same way as our stock_trader.

Doesn't matter how extreme or any truth in it. The idea behind is to link the Liberal Party ideology to US consumers in order to scare Canadians about the opposition party in case there is an election soon.

Cramer is finally fallen due too his many wrong calls and his arrogance. I'm worried that one day our stock_trader will get the same fate as Cramer. :D

Spaghetti model would work best.

I think we misunderstood here. When people said Greenspan was responsible, not for the entire mistake, but rather a warning missed given so he was somehow reponsible a portion of it, meaning that he, as someone sitting on the top of knowledge in this domain and the power he has, should give some...

People are smart enough to realise the bubble pain as we're experiencing right now. So they don't repeat the same mistake until the next generation.

If you argue, you lose. If the person repeatedly argue to refuse accepting being wrong especially when you didn't ask/blame too much then it hints that the person was responsible. If somebody can prove that all the money that were used to bid and buy those houses are not borrowed-money (only...

:D Yep. If the abandoned house is not get heated in the cold country then the house will be deteriorated. If Mr. Buffett loses 99.99% of his wealth. He still has the same damn living style and spending habit.