Search results

Hi ezzy, thanks for putting them up but none of the links worked.

OK! here it is... i will further work backwards and correlate to price moves and see if it fits. In order not to clog the thread with my mistakes laden charts further, I will go back to drills for awhile on my own to see how things are different using volume with no price to annotate. TQ...

TQ for your comments and input. Is that then perhaps the way the correct way to draw based on volume ? Yes, you are right that my gaussians are drawn to correspond to price moves based on my understanding that the gaussians should reflect each price move with a 4 sub volume moves. Is this then a...

This probably go back to basic annotations 101 but its a fundamental requirement to get this right. I have posted 2 questions on the 2 ND moves of the fractals you have put in. The first relates to ND starting bar 50 1:40pm of which I am not 100% clear how the ND is justified unless... we...

My view of 04June2010. Looked like I can only draw only 1 SF short container R2R within which only 1 2b non-dom move after TF r2r before resuming the move down. Feel I might still missed something in terms of maintaining within the same fractals during annotations.

I took a clean 5m chart and drew the lines to give a better perspective from 5/21 to 6/1 but I am not clear as to how the long blue up fractal come into the picture of my question ? Would you care to clarify again what you mean to start it on Friday 5/21 ? TIA

I manually combined last Fri's chart with Tues 01 June, and see that I would need to re-work on the fractals again. So the TF long in the beginning of 01June would be a non dom TF traversing PT2 - 3, creating an FTT @ 10:30 AM, correct ? And the SF is still on a dom short (superimposed thick...

If the SF is drawn as such, that would mean my earlier PT 1, 2 and 3 is incorrect since the SF PT1 cannot be the PT2 of the previous channel, right ? Hence, the Pt 2 of the long fractal would still be on bar 5 9:55 AM before the VE ?

This is my view of todays chart after review and correcting some mistakes. On hindsight, it is clear after RTH but during the day, questions were many due to uncertainties. I think putting in the right logging would clear alot of things up during charting time.

Jack, you hit the nail on the head on this. I think this is where I am - not able to be certain at ALL times of the parallelogram and not able to ask the question to test the correctness of the parallelogram many times during annotation and logging. You have mentioned on the correct...

Tnx Tiki for putting up the chart. So we have got PT3 on the SF container and the TF short will look for point 2. What I don't understand is how you have drawn the pt2 of the TF (dashed dark blue) from Mar 2009 on Jan 2010. According to the chart, shouldn't pt 2 be at June 2009 when you draw...

The tanker would be a quick fix and drilling a parallel one would be a good way too barring time constraints. The parallel well can be harvested which might bring the pressure off the leaking one so that repair work can be done.

Getting more into annotating the sub FF gaussians provided a better understanding of the FF moves and helped to improve the FF annotations and subsequently the TF. Sometimes it gets too crowded at that sub level to be able to see clearly and make mistakes again. Logging properly might be the way...

Thanks Nkhoi, My chart is compressed that 1 tic is not visible to the eye. Nevertheless, would one tick still equate to a HH ?

Using CP1, I have reworked today's chart as best as I could. I realize there is alot of mistakes on the FF . I circled 2 areas where I suspect there are fractal jumpings as I can't complete the FF 4 vol moves for 1 TF PV pattern completely. Another question is TF2, which I had annotated to start...

if i may add, on the bar 45 ibgs - i would think of it as 2 moves when a new low was made on a short 2r move of the FF, carried over from bar 44 and continued on bar 45 for the 2b with the close higher the previous bar 44 (heads up for green marker next) and subsequently bar 46 for a b2b bo of...

nkhoi, That did the trick. Had to wait for the NT to sync with the computer time but it did mess up all my annotations since there is a time difference now. Thanks !:cool:

Glad you are back , Jack. Wishing you calm and all the best.

Hopefully, Jack will continue on this matter. I post yesterday's chart. Think I might not have annotated the channels correctly but I did get some r2r b2b on the fast fractal. So are those areas circled examples of fractals jumping ? I can only draw 1 channel up but that doesn't seem right...

Nogap_prevday doesn't work either. In fact, tried the various version posted in this thread unsuccessfully including another ngchart. I am still using ver6.5 of NT if that would make any difference. Anyway, thanks for your efforts. Sure hope this can be resolve and save time to degap...