Search results

still works for me: https://www.optionsxpress.com/quote_option_chain.asp?SYMBOL=QQQQ&PAGE=PR

OP showed dislike or naivety regarding rate negotiations. But now some light has been shed on a more important issue. In the early posts of this thread, OP was not identified as located in Asia. And it should/does not matter anyway. I am astonished that OEC verified different rates based on...

I suggest you go somewhere else, maybe IB or Etrade, where the client is bound to published rates with no chance of lower regardless of account value or trade volume. Good luck with your trading.

Here's snapshot from my link: http://www.openecry.com/rates/rates.cfm

Where do you see 2.81? It's posted as 2.31 . You can negotiate it lower. If you're good, you can get 2.00 or less, per-side, all-in

You do not know how read? Prices you have posted are not what's published. This is the second thread Ive seen with this exact same slander from you. Do you have an agenda? The link you provided has lower rates than your bastardisation, and the published rates are negotiable.

Not 2.81, 2.31 per-side all-in is published. Negotiations are also welcome. Not unreasonable at all for retail.

According to another thread, an IB rep suggests checking margin requirements in real-time via TWS. Unless verified via real-time or official correspondence, best to assume no intraday advantage; full overnight margin levels for all futures instruments.

Not a trading song: rather the theme song of ET! Elephant Talk by King Crimson.

Taken from the FAQ's from http://www.frbdiscountwindow.org/index.cfm 9. Does the Federal Reserve share the list of depository institutions eligible for primary and secondary credit with bank regulators? Does the Federal Reserve share information about institutions' use of the discount...

I have no idea if your strategy would be acceptable, but here's another US-based broker offering direct access to a few International exchanges, including Xetra: http://www.nobletrading.com/worldwide.php

RML Trading ChoiceTrade MBTrading LowTrades Zecco RML offers the most pricing plans, Zecco has the best price, bar none, if you make only a few trades per month. The recommendation of InteractiveBrokers by others, is very costly for trading large blocks of penny stocks.

DUNG coverage reiterated as a Strong Buy, with a lowered price target from $200 to $110.

An answer, not a recommendation: http://pfgbest.com/pfgstore/product.asp?pid=54

No PM from me. You've confused me with a phisherman.

dividend: It is an obnoxious, sarcastic, stick-it-to-the-non-bullievers comment. (And has now morphed to stick-it-to-the-non-bearlievers.) THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ZERO RISK IN FUTURES, OR ANY OTHER INSTRUMENT.

Not taking away from the intent of your comments, is there a reason you (or others) can't do same or very similar analysis?

All firms are required by SEC or NASD, I forget which, to post for public disclosure a Rule 606 report. The report contains execution details, and other material items such as payment for order flow. Rule 606 report is REQUIRED to be available for the public , but some firms may "hide" the...

Because the clearing agent determines the rules for trading. For example, short-list, pre/post market trading availabilty, margin rates, funds availabilty, etc. Moreover, clearing agents may receive fees for order flow, some more notorious than others.

http://www.nobletrading.com/worldwide.php