Search results

no I caught on to the fact you post garbage for cash a long time ago.

I admit when your specifically lecturing about the trial court decision you wrote this.... and then you tried to hide your ignorance with this back pedal and a reference to the law "in general". No one is arguing about appellate courts and the supreme ct and the existence of stare decisis...

Fake Science... fake news. We don't know in any detail. The moron author ignores the fact co2 could be absorbed by sinks Co2 can be off gassed and that the data shows co2 levels follow change in ocean temps. finally it ignores NASA science which shoes co2 also cools. Many decades ago...

you don't know what the hell you are talking about but you are funny. you are like a comedy skit you are misusing terms like stare decisis, precedent and defacto law and not aware why I stated trial court decisions are not binding on other trial courts. this is what you sound like to a...

How come not a single agw nutter troll can produce even one peer reviewed article which states man made co2 causes warming which does not rely on failed models? Why? there is not science behind their claim... its a theory at best... and it has problems even as a theory because all our data...

gaslighting is now asking a journalist that a journalist have support for his statement when he says the president got it all wrong? Tell us after all expenses are accounted for - is the USPS making on the Amazon contract. === Finally you bullshitting troll I am not saying Trump was right I...

any distractions on this thread to hide the fact that we now see even the agw nutter scientists could not produce any science to show the court that man made co2 causes warming. because as we have told this chorus of trolls there is not science showing man made co2 causes warming that does...

so once again you should have quit instead of doubling down on your jurisprudential ignorance. in general... and I can't think of any exceptions... trial court results are not binding on other trial courts. they don't make law or de facto law... they find facts and apply the law to those...

what does economic sense mean in a political situation? economic sense in an entity which loses money could mean anything. economic sense could mean really should be charging more but we need short run revenues even if we lose money in the long run on the deal. nothing there says the the post...

I believe you took a fairly simple statement way too far. God preferring mercy to sacrifice does not mean... "The whole idea of sacrifice is blasphemous, especially the "sacrifice" of his "only" Son. This includes torture for any length of time, or death for any length of time." === I am...

its like you refuse to use logic. all that says is that a commission who overseas a venture has oversight on the venture. nothing there proves Amazon deal earns profits for the post office. "The report was mentioned in a widely circulated Wall Street Journal commentary by shipping...

I have to repeat the phrase accurately because your team always tries to play gotcha instead of providing science. I could say there is no peer reviewed science which says that man made co2 causes warming. As the founder of green peace says... But then you will pull out garbage papers which...

that goes straight to my point... the article says... no one knows the terms of the contract with Amazon... but... your articles states... So how the hell does Shep Smith know that Trump was wrong about everything. Smith was a moron and you are not doing a good job defending him.He does not...

How do you manage to almost always make wrong pronouncements about the legal system. This time you got closer... but you still lack understanding of the finer points. I think you meant the "decision" stands not the decision not stands as "law". I am not aware of horizontal stare decisis for...

its funny because I pointed out a few years ago when chief nutter scientist Hansen has been put on the spot he also refers to the IPCC reports. Why? Because there is no legitimate science showing man made co2 is causing warming. its just failed models and the crooked IPCC reports. This...

this is my problem with weak minds and lies in the news. Reporters and news outlets did not let this kind of weak thinking on the air years ago. Journalists made carefully considered choices before they made indictments. Smith was full of shit... when he said Trump was wrong about...

you create the non sequitur and then act the other person has the burden to prove you are wrong? AAA spoke of shep smith... he did not speak of all minorities being quota fills. That was your projection. if shep smith had any talent or brains he would have given out accurate info during his...

do I have to make it this obvious. implying that shep was in a job should not be in because he is gay does not mean AAA thinks all minorities are quota fills. Do you get that? Not every statement about a minority is slur against all. Stating Obama's father is from Africa and that therefore...

Context is important. When Europeans start calling out the US... in the old days -- I found it funny when an American told them to take a shower, go to the dentist and get back to us. Was that bigoted or a fair reply to a condescending European. So I am not sure if what wildchild said was...

I am saying the thrust of your argument was a non sequitur.