Search results

This is your opinion.. Congress voted for both wars, in bipartisan fashion. Again the govt isn't obligated or even authorized to spend on ANY of the things I just listed. bush leaving office with a 1.2T deficit doesn't make the last 5T any less obama's debt, he didn't do shit about it, in fact...

assuming that's true.. so what? the debt still went up 5T+ under obama.. so far. that is the same way you are judging Reagan and Bush, Reagan had the cold war, Bush had 9/11.. and the fed govt has an obligation to defend the country. They aren't obligated to provide food stamps, bailouts...

You're right, I'm wrong about SS itself. Still Reps are NOT responsible for ALL of the 16T debt. Still that is an asinine statement. Most federal programs have been enacted by dems. Ricter and I were talking about this the other day.. if dems pass a program, like obamacare, then when...

I don't know where you are getting that info but according to wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_Trust_Fund, SS was owed about 3T as of last year, meaning that money has been blown elsewhere. I'm sure you will say its on the wars but who really knows. Also, the 'borrowing'...

What an asinine statement. have you happened to hear of SS or Medicare or Medicaid? These entitlements are now the majority of the budget, they double military spending, and they are considered "mandatory". Democrats passed all of this shit, but instead of trying to fix their broken, unfunded...

+1 The family is a cornerstone in any society. I respect the right of people to believe whatever they want and I respect people that they take care of themselves and their own blood to the best of their ability.

haha he is such a douche.. i swear i saw a post from him the other day that said "you know what they say a mil here a mil there" and some other nonsense about companies "of which I've run a few". :p

lol so do you have any proof that anything I said was half true? Or should i take this lame ass response as basically, "NO I have nothing."

It is intentional dickhead. Now do you have any argument here or are you just gonna stick with "half true" and continue to look ridiculous?

I happen to use profanity to stress my point, especially when it is obvious, but whoever I'm addressing can't seem to acknowledge it. Now instead of changing the subject why don't you don't you just concede to the facts or prove me wrong?

WTF is "half true" about FULL CONTROL OF CONGRESS? Or that debt holders did NOT get treated as they should by rule of law in the auto bailouts? Or that he passed obamacare during the 2nd largest recession ever.. with out a single Rep vote? Or that he passed the stimulus? Anyone with a...

Oh and look at this: http://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-auto-bailout-and-the-rule-of-law. (you might want to read the whole thing because it bashes Bush as well). They really FUCKED OVER the debtors at Chrysler. The secured debt holders received less on the dollar than the...

He DID all of these things, they are facts, what the fuck does fox news have to do with the actions of the President? go ahead and point out which of these are false.

How many times are you gonna repeat the same total bullshit? the FACT is obama had 2 full years of complete control of Congress.. he passed whatever he wanted. his economic plan was the stimulus, it didn't do shit except rack up more debt. he spent his time on obamacare.. a new entitlement...

That we effect everyone else more than they do us should tell you our policies are (were) better.. so you should strive to be more like us instead of trying to get us to be more like you. As someone else pointed out, the issue of trade is entirely separate.. if you don't like the policies of...

Why would we EVER consider what the rest of the world thinks? America and its fed govt belong to Americans, not illegal immigrants, not foreigners, not the UN. Your 'idea' is beyond foolish, it conveys a sense of entitlement I can't even begin to understand. Please let me know why you feel...

Well there are cases where it is 100%.. like teh batman shooter. Or a serial killer who gets uncovered years later. Or a confession. Or getting caught in the act. I am saying just in those cases.

i dunno man, but on the part of politicians, it is more intentional stupidity than ignorance.. it is pandering taken to the extreme. WE have a right to defend ourselves, let the citizens of Chicago arm themselves and carry.. might get worse for a while but the criminals who do and will ignore...

a) I agree that is the major problem, and it has happened before. BUT in cases where there is no doubt whatsoever, 100% fact that we know who is responsible, they should be executed. In the example of the batman shooter, it is a certainty that he did it.. he should be dead already imo. b)...

oh no way RCG is calling something racist, wow. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION is racist policy though for certain.