Search results

I can relate, once I conquered my fear of clowns things really took off.

So you are saying the market will drop.

insurance where everyone collects? A subsidy? WTF? Is this some sort of liberal word game or what?

Reich is one of those lefties that gives me an allergic reaction just seeing him. I can't stand academics who treat their religion as scientific truth, then hit the political circuit like some sort of revival preacher. I have thought about that one a little. Actually what Congress did was...

Do you guys really think that in 2 minutes you guys can understand what's 'wrong' with the economy? This is retarded.

and yet you didn't skip this ridiculous thread

when psychosis sets in, I would imagine every disagreement is abusive

I can't help it... I picture a pasty guy in a tight collared shirt- ketchup stained and unwashed, tight cordurouy pants, noticeable pieces of food between teeth, thin hair combed straight back, and a really good collection of Spiderman memorabilia. Weird, not many people on the internet make...

terribly sad, we won't get an honest dialoge in our lifetime, all we'll get is the same old blame-guilt-excuse dynamic. no solutions on the horizon

A clear picture is emerging about the myth and folklore of the 332nd. when did the myth start? So 25 is possible, but not probable. In any event they flew 311 missions, not 200 but if you consider that for most of their missions they encounteed no enemy fighters or were escorting no bombers...

oh well, some people are threatened by honest discussion, that's all I can say.

Bold emphasis mine. The Air Force Historian analyzed 5 of the 33 escort missions of the 332nd and counted 25 bomber losses, that was the source of the number 25. After that he loooked at 3 more missions and came up with 7 possibles. Out of 8 missions analyzed we have 25-32 lost bombers...

aww C'mon, really? REALLY? ... are you that fucking stupid? My source: Dr. Daniel L. Haulman, Air Force Historical Research Agency Updated 26 Nov 2008

You need to stop, really, you need to stop embarrassing yourself. Understand something first, then try posting My source: Dr. Daniel L. Haulman, Air Force Historical Research Agency Updated 26 Nov 2008 ...and I told you that he said that there were probably more than 25 because he didn't...

little girl, every try reading? ok, I DID NOT intend to become so diverted, but since the children cannot help themselves.... Somebody *cough* cannot understand the difference between a sortie and a mission. Go look it up yourself, I am not going to spoon feed everything. Let's dig...

c, The very first racist comment in this thread came from RCG on page 3 or 4, of course. Then Ricter ponted out this movie was based on race in response to my bemoaning the fact that we can't have a good just a good war movie. Then I showed how the race discussion continues today about black...

AK, You have posted nothing in this thread demonstrating anything like knowledge.

I was addressing another one of your ill informed comments that the Tuskegee low aerial kill count is explainable considering that they were escorting bombers for their primary mission. How many bombers the 352nd lost is not relevant to that point. Is it too much to ask that you read for...

More letters means more combinations, if you pick 3 letters at random the chance you pick RCG is one in 17576. Picking two numerical digits randomly means 1 chance in 100 to get 88. The probably of mere coincidence is FAR higher for me. Therefore you are outed. Certainly RCG could mean...

Oh and 88 could not mean anything else but what you say, I see. The correlation between RCG is and the communist group is far stronger. 3 digits instead of 2, 26 letters instead of 10 numerals- the chances of coincidence are FAR higher in the 88case since it is 1/100 chance while in your case...