Search results

THANK YOU!

OMG

I never followed the Edwards case, so I'm not qualified to comment on it. However I have followed Trumps misdeeds closely. Trump has mostly avoided personal liability via the structure of his fiascoes. He brags, and lies of course, about never settling out of court. The truth is just the...

The legal opinions I've read indicate the charge can result in anything from a slap on the wrist and a fine to a felony conviction and jail time depending on the knowledge and intent of the perpetrator. It seems inadvertent violations are treated lightly, whereas intentional violations may get...

This is probably not of interest to a Trump Toady, however I believe Cohen also plead guilty to charges of campaign finance violation in which Trump was named as an unindicted co-conspirator, tax evasion and bank fraud...

Can you back that statement up with a quote not taken out of context? That would add some credibility to your claim. I am on record as saying he has a severe mental disorder known as psychopathic narcissism, and is unfit to be president. He's a jerk and an asshole. Feel free to quote me on...

Let us know how things work out.:D

It's not.

Are you trolling now?

There are apparently some folks who never listen to the news or read a newspaper!

I guess all those folks were indicted for no reason then. :rolleyes: And some of them must be pretty pissed sitting there in jail.

So it runs in the family! And so how do we know what the opinion of those who drafted the constitution would be were we to exhume them and bring them back to life? Glad you asked. We have a record of their considerable discussion on the matter of whether the President should be above the law...

One of the nuances attending an investigation of a president that I doubt you fully grasp is the inherent conflict of interest created when such as investigation is under supervision of DOJ. Because DOJ is a part of the Administrative Branch of Government, an investigation carried out in this...

If there is anything necrotic here it's your cerebral cortex. The Constitution provides a way to fire a lawbreaker. It leaves punishment up to statutory law. It fully anticipates, because the President is not above the law, that a criminal president will be indicted and tried. It says...

I look forward to it. We know parenting and environment are strong predictors, i.e., highly correlated. Therefore a potentially fruitful area of inquiry is whether there is a second best alternative when parenting and environment are far from ideal.

Buy canned soup, bottled water, lots of toilet paper, and ammo.

The best thing to do if you are trading is to ignore all news unless it is news of a neutron bomb gone off in the small world ride at Disney World , or Trump has admitted he is an asshole. In the first case, stocks will go down briefly; in the second case, up briefly. The people who write the...

You're misquoting me again. So what's new. I never would have meant to say it THAT way! That is suggesting that the Constitution prevents indicting a sitting President. Some lawyer you are! The Constitution is completely silent on the issue. So in that sense the Constitution is immaterial...

You have answered your own question. Being a minority is not an important criterion for failure. That's obvious. You might be on to something here: "...many minorities do not even try, whether it is voting or investing in their personal development over fears they are just wasting their time"...

It's based on intellect obviously. That's also more than likely why you don't get it.