Search results

I never even said this. You're putting words in my mouth, then arguing with things I never said. I said "news" meaning events. Never did I say the 6 o'clock evening news or CNBC. Btw, that's why data releases move price most when they differ from the expectation.

Care to describe your indicators?

I've never witnessed how major good/bad news worked in the opposite direction. I've only seen where it was overshadowed by something else.

Yea after the fact. That's what I said too. First comes the event, then comes the sentiment.

I think sentiment is a better word. And world events definitely affect sentiment.

So you're a conspiracy theorist then.

All I'm saying is that the news precedes the flow of money.

I'm not even watching news when posting those charts. I know that a recent trend could change at any time if a larger fundamental force acts on it. I'm just trying to get a quantitative grasp on what's been going on recently. It would be impossible to have the same information as they do. And...

Even if they get information faster, they are still reacting. Unless you're claiming that Bank of America is controlling the coronavirus? Or JP Morgan knows the intentions of Iran? Btw, have you ever watched a tick chart around a major data release? Nothing happens before the time of the...

Either way, they're still reacting to it right? Unless you're a conspiracy theorist?

Here's my point of view... The price of anything is determined by supply and demand. What drives demand? What causes people (such as commercial institutions) to want to put money in something? Primarily, it's the usefulness of the item in question. For example, if lots of new construction is...

My few days of screenshot doesn't capture fundamental forces. I'm claiming that perhaps this trend captures what is going on under the current forces (at least until some other fundamental force comes into play). I still do not agree that trends can be drawn on forces from 2013. Those...

Because whatever fundamental forces that were moving USD/JPY in 2013 have nothing to do with today.

Really? Weekly? Here's a chart using weekly bars. The left side of the chart goes all the way back to 2013. At those long timeframes, aren't technicals meaningless?

Is that a lot?

Eyeball what would prove my trade right or wrong. Then I might adjust later to lock in some gains or move SL to zero, or something like that.

Despite the fact that it eventually went down again, I would have actually closed my TP at a profit. Android. IG Forex.

Singapore

Look for a consistent trend on 90ema of hopefully the past 2 weeks.

Do you understand that I'm not trying to enter trades at pin bars?