i couldn't watch that show. carville sounds like a dirty south rapper and tucker's bow ties just annoyed the shit out of me.. couldn't get past it.
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/RxiFnVbLu1o?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
i couldn't watch that show. carville sounds like a dirty south rapper and tucker's bow ties just annoyed the shit out of me.. couldn't get past it.
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/RxiFnVbLu1o?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe
well futurecurrents certainly does 'contribute' if i must call it that.. and he is way out left, maybe beyond FT and brass.
Thanks for the additions though.. interesting placement for me.
this is good shit right here. there is a certain sense of scumbag entitlement present in most govt workers.. especially among the bottom ranks. Anyone who has EVER been to a fucking dmv or called the irs knows what i'm talking about. You know what group doesn't have this attitude - soldiers...
that's what you made this for: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=241493&highlight=test
of course non of these are totally accurate but it gives a general sense i think.
bath tao, what about tomdavis, bigarrow, ME, mav88, mav74, trefoil, piezoe, stu, yannis, denner
and can't forget my boy futurecurrents
edit: can you add just me then.. i'd be interested in where u place me.
no.. let's give him Congress too, cause that worked out so well just a few years ago. HE makes Congress hostile because of his policies. Since the media is so fucking in bed with him, he will get to lean on the reps anyway and blame them for things not getting done. They will need to do...
they wouldn't need it because they won't have entitlements gone wild, plus there would be a mass exodus of the productive from NY and Cali etc to the red states. If you live within your means you can't blow up. We have the most means here in the US but our govt refuses to exist within them...
I get what you're saying and it holds weight even though it isn't apples to apples because unlimited living bennies can obviously exceed the fixed value death benefit. Since I'm not an ins underwriter I can't give estimated private rates for seniors, but I'll give you the next best thing...
I wasn't 'representing' lucrum, i was pointing out that it isn't hypocritical to accept the benefits of something that you've been forced to pay for, whether or not you disagree in principle. That was my argument. But I'll also point out that you DO have to contribute something to receive...
which universe are you in? This 'response' is just a bunch of gibberish that has nothing to do with me quoting you.. I didn't even bring up medicare busting out, you're dodging the question.
You asked lucrum if he would deny medicare out of principle, which is what i quoted. Assuming he...
first things first, my whole reason for quoting you initially: If you are forced to pay into medicare, then you should take the benefits whether or not you agree with the program. I get your point that it is possible, if not likely, that most individuals will exceed their lifetime...