Search results

Despite your dictatorial proclamations and how ever much you wish it weren't so, there can't be faith where there is non. And I don't ridicule the concept of God. You manage that well enough by yourself with the ridiculous things you say. So it is confirmed. Faith in fact must by...

Quite certain, to a point, then uncertain, where faith starts to suspend doubt.

Whether it's chicken bones or a deity, putting faith in superstition is essentially a means to avoid doubt, a way to not address actual circumstances where true courage may be born. Doubt provides objectivity and is the basis for enquiry led knowledge. But in the face of doubt, the...

To explain the unknown by the known, there is science. To explain the unknown with the not known, there is religion.

....in short then, the religious.

Wait a sec...shouldn't jesus have 2 birth certificates if he was born again?

How sweet the song of nonsense sounds in a creationist's ear.

Along with 8 others.

It doesn't surprise me neither chance nor design is known to you in biology . It's essential to your assertions that such things are not known of. To an ID'er, denial and ignorance is everything. Yes of course you do already know that magical chance thingy/theory. You call it...

Of course design and chance is known in biology, cosmology, etc. Both are scientifically explained. It is intelligent design creationism which is not known, has no explanation , where design becomes guesswork wrapped up in wishful thinking, and fat chance is all you have in hope of it...

I don't think so, those 3 are pretty much what a hiippy is all about. ..oh right yeah..... tofu.

sure, but purely on questions of flowers, sex and peace.

"They are one" ?...that's just hippy stuff man :cool:

Didn’t you mean you mean to say "I don't know anyone who thinks that artisans or architects are not designers.". As your arguments get so bizarre, it may not be a mistake. Of course design is known of in biology, cosmology, etc. Just as much as it is in architecture. And as for...

...or chance/order, increasing chance for more order.

You are opposed to the teaching of art or architecture in school , or did you mean intelligent design? So no teaching of any science intrinsic in or connected to abiogenesis or evolution then. Just teach kids how not to know stuff.

Imagine the possibility of some second entity generating in advance, for example, the outcome of all coin tosses the first entity will ever make... and a third entity and a forth.....

So why teach and indoctrinate children into the chance of an intelligent designer ?

No I didn't ignore the question of chance. Now you're even denying stuff posted in the thread. But then your world has already crumbled into denial.

That's the thing isn't it. I didn't ignore, so you're stuck with making that absurd comment. There is no reasonable argument for intelligent design so all you've done in defense of it is attack science and then attack the messenger. Science proves evolution so you deny the science that...