Search results

Yes, of course you are right. The emoluments suit, and I think there were originally three, and one was withdrawn or thrown out, and I believe there are two now (maybe?). The one in the news had to do with a challenge from the DOJ with regard to whether bribery had to be involved. The court...

However these charges are NOT duds. They are dead serious charges with substantial evidence having been filed with the respective courts. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-foundation-lawsuit-has-merit-on-many-levels-legal-expert-says/ and...

??? Well actually the DNC, using money raised by Hillary, paid, via the DNC's lawyer, a guy named Simpson, who ran Fusion, who then paid Steele to continue an investigation that Fusion had begun under a Republican Sponsor who was trying to stop Donald Trump from getting the nomination. So, if...

It was a tool to open the door. A door that definitely needed to be opened unless you think its ok to have a crook for a president. I must be one of the exceptions re collusion because I didn't know there was no "collusion from the jump", and I still don't know that. I always assumes there...

Oh, Right!

Are we going to be hearing about the steele dossier five years from now just like we are still hearing about Bill on the Tarmac, Benghazi, the missing emails, White Water, the Deep State, the Soft Coup, the government bringing down the Twin Towers, the Creature from Jekyl Island, George Soros...

What are those abuses of power?

One of the Emolument suits against Mr. Trump (I think there are several) just passed a court hurdle involving the definition of emolument and whether there has to be bribery involved. According to the court there doesn't. With this, the case in New York challenging the legitimacy of his...

That has zero to do with what is meant by "strict construction." I could give you an example of a case where Breyer's minority opinion relied on strict construction and Scalia's majority opinion rested on interpretation of what is actually written according to original intent, i.e...

Nevertheless when you speak of what the Founders envisioned, it was most certainly not a country in which there was anything like universal suffrage. This is what makes any one who is today championing what the Founders envisioned for the country seem so out of touch. Certainly you could...

Let's be clear here. It's your reality, not everyone else's.

The 13th amendment runs counter to, i.e., disrespects, "... what the founders envisioned for the country." Our vision for the country two hundred plus years later is vastly different from what the founders envisioned, and thank goodness. Sorry to say you and your thinking are anachronisms in...

Yes, Massa!

Can there be any doubt that our President is insane!

Not to mention the "deep state", the "soft coup," and "Bill on the tarmac."

:rolleyes: Have you thought about doing your own YouTube video on the Deep State and its "soft coup", and how how our "stable genius" President is going to rescue the blue collar worker using imaginary tariffs he's negotiated using his "special technique" based on chaos theory and a putting iron.

Yah, Right, Absolutely Nothing.:D New York Attorney General Sues Trump Foundation After 2-Year ... https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/.../trump-foundation-lawsuit-attorney-general.htm... Jun 14, 2018 - The New York State attorney general's office filed a scathingly worded lawsuit on Thursday...

If it weren’t for President Obama we might not have done the intelligence community assessment that we did that set up a whole sequence of events which are still unfolding today including Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation. President Obama is responsible for that. It was he who tasked us to...

I thought it was a rather good example of circumstantial evidence, don't you? Or maybe they didn't teach you what that is. Re the D.J. Trump Foundation matter, maybe you should wait for the judgement before opening your mouth. Better to be silent and thought a fool, than open your mouth and...

Yes that's sensible. Wait for the outcome. Of course you are aware that Trump has maintained that he doesn't settle law suits, he always wins them -- just another one of his absurd remarks. If he tells you he is not going to settle the Foundation case, how would you know whether to believe him...