Search results

So let's get this straight... According to you... George Soros is an idiot. Ray Dalio is an idiot. Is Warren Buffett an idiot too? They just aren't up to your standards? I can practically guarantee that you know nothing about economics. I think anyone who knows anything about economics would...

Android. I don't time to stare at a computer all day. I wouldn't want you live that lifestyle anyway.

Did your mommy make your dinner yet? Do you post here when you're not too busy playing Pokemon?

Recommend the 3 best books to read. And actually I'm reading a book by George Soros right now. But that's obviously not TA. Although I guarantee he is a lot closer to knowing why prices move than any TA guys. I'm 99% certain that TA is a bunch of nonsense. But I'm willing to let someone prove...

I don't get it

I'm ready to give TA a try. I'm going to start with currency pairs that have low bid/ask spreads. To start out, what's the best timeframe and indicator combo to use? This is paper trading for now.

Where does he say what his predicting strategies are?

Did I miss where he says how he bases his predictions?

Not if he blew up his whole account like was said

I'm not really talking about stocks. I'm talking about fundamentals of the economy as a whole. The stock market is just one part of that.

If your TP point is 2x as large as your SL, then you are 50% as likely to hit it. So it all equals out again. It all goes back to having some way of accurately predicting.

So $50k just appeared out of nowhere so he could start again?

Ray Dalio net worth = $16.9 billion George Soros net worth = $8.6 billion IamTheCasino net worth =

$8k loss as of today, but also the EIA showed that gasoline demand is up for the week. It's still well below normal levels. $8k = $.063/gallon. I am still watching fundamentals and basing things on that.

And this requires successfully PREDICTING what will happen >50% of the time. I am unwilling to consider TA as anything more than voodoo nonsense. The answers lie in economic fundamentals, which are a massively complicated topic that even PhD's don't understand fully. Ray Dalio's fund lost 18%...

And that same "less risk" will limit the gains also. Statistically, it equals out.

The reason I would lose statistically over time is basically the bid/ask spread or commission. If I don't hedge, my "big wins" will cancel out my "big losses" and it amounts to the same thing. It all boils down to being able to predict something. And to only make trades when I have good reason...

Unless I'm missing something... Does he say anything about WHY he thought it would be good to enter the trades at those specific points?

Or that.

If they have stingers that can penetrate beekeeper suits... Then I think it's time we pack up and head to Mars.