Search results

What reason do you have this time why your computer wouldn't log on as jem into ET ........? Is res-'typing guy' in your head going to be talking as yourself from now on, or on your behalf as before? Who says "was called Christ" is not a profession of faith? .... was called Christ...

Jesus is a fictional creation. "But the basic question surely is, doesn't all this primarily equate to one first convincing oneself that Batman actually exists, in order to discuss how his fictional parents died.. Correspondengly one first convinces oneself that God actually exists, in order...

The problem here is not a lack of any scholars who dispute the 'non TF passage'. Your problem is a lack of any reasoned argument. Being in denial, you're only interested in scholars that don't dispute Josephus. Even YOUR Wiki quote disputes in effect all the text. It states....It is often...

So The question of Batman would have to be answered with an "I don't know for sure at this particular moment" if one is honest with oneself... Or does one just exempt God on grounds of special pleading at this particular moment ?

In fact -- you are in denial. Explanations, reasons, quotes, scholars, already provided, mean nothing to you when they don't correspond with what you want to hear. It is simply plain commonsense that Josephus cannot stand as historical evidence for Jesus . Reasons already given. There...

In God We Trust

Agreed, you did say that and I note what you are also saying given someone is using irrational argument as a believer in superstion and religion . But the basic question surely is, doesn't all this primarily equate to one first convincing oneself that Batman actually exists, in order to...

You mean like convincing oneself Batman was once real in order to discuss how his fictional parents were killed?

Fact is Jem I'm not lying. That is the problem you have. On numerous occasions I have given reason why the quote YOU provided - being the same quote Christian apologists gave trying to establish their page on Wiki - clearly applies to ALL Josephus texts. Just because you...

Yes, why are you lying? It is your quote, you linked it. And your weirdo screen name split personality schizophrenia. What's that all about? The apologist scholarly mainstream not only inexplicably ignores the fact that there is nothing that stands as historical evidence for a biblical...

I gave you a scholar. A pre-eminent christian scholar. Not liking what he says, you ignorantly dismissed the learned man like the moron you are by calling him a bozo media whore. There is no point in me quoting scholars when you act like a complete tool that way. And the silly quote...

1. Lets establish that a man named Jesus lived. No one in history has ever done that. luckily not only are there gnostic texts unluckily for you, gnostic texts do not constitute historical evidence that Jesus ever existed the source documents for the bible stories in narrative form...

Ricter, Jem told me he can not log in on this computer so he asked that I write this. I own a business with multiple machines and I work from multiple places. Some of those machines allow multiple people to login. So I have decided to allow only one machine to login as JEM for the time...

You know really, if you have nothing sensible to say, why don't you just shut up. The only things distorted here are the Josephus text, your argument, and you. WTF are you saying now .....You can use any computer to login ET as Jem. Who the hell are you trying to kid. You've been...

My arguments comical? You’re dressing up in another alias, pretending to be another person talking about yourself..the ‘typing guy’... you don't even know what the argument is….so you think my argument is comical!? From the start you have not been able to grasp THE one single...

That post and previous, manifests you as a griefer . So you're saying I'm a griefer. .....furthermore, you're still griefing about griefing. sheesh I'm wrong,... a griefer, because you will not or cannot deal with the substance of the argument. brilliant!

No that's not what I said. Instead of jumping to ill thought conclusion every time, why not just ask if you can't understand? Try reading what I did say properly and try reading your own link. You really should read the links YOU give. Here is what it states... " The phrase "he...

"Jem told me he can not log in on this computer so he asked that I write this. " "yes -- at some point I (jem typing on his office machine) " Feeling a need to explain those schizophrenic tendencies Jem, may help you get over yourselves.. Acting and sounding a complete dick in front...

There is no such thing as true Scotsmen or true theists. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

Agnosticism is the view that the truth value of certain claims—especially claims about the existence or non-existence of any deity, but also other religious and metaphysical claims—is unknown or unknowable.[1] Therefore Agnosticism does not actually hold belief in any deity...