Search results

That would be the same evidence as in the feeling that the earth is flat. Seems the less evidence there is of any kind, the more superstition about an intelligent designer can get a hold.

It seems creationists really can't even distinguish between a scientific theory and a guess, yet they'll try and kid themselves they can nevertheless discern what scientific evidence is, describes and explains. And yes Eight, your problem really is that the creationist arguments you and...

Those are exactly the same arguments other similar deniers to yourself use to try and bring some sort of perverse justification to their own personal beliefs. Scientific theories are not only theories as you've said they are. Science simply does not embrace theories without question as...

Lol! All your silly insults and pathetic remarks and you're still angry after months and months for not fathoming the blindingly obvious. So that's why you're confused. It's with unfalsifiable and implausible , because you couldn't discriminate two sentences from each other. Of...

In your defense you've made it clear that like a creationist or a flat earther, you come to a point where it is found necessary to be anti-science, which seems to strangely validate some other personal conclusions.

As long as you imagine gratuitous insult is all that’s needed for your argument, you’ll remain just as wrong as you ever were.

You can make any unsound, uncorroborated statement, and <strike>often</strike> always do. Science is not to do with atheism or theism, it's to do with science you goof.

When you get anything that even looks like a reasonable argument rather than just infantile insult let me know.

..which isn't being at all scientific of you.

Ok, and I'm saying a system that can't teach students to read, or do basic science (which by necessity includes evolution), do basic math (which by necessity includes multiplication), or even locate England on a map, is in a state of total collapse.

Yes I do expect them to begin to grasp evolutionary science. The basics, certainly. You don’t? Just as I expect them to do simple math AND understand why Newton was so important. I expect that they be taught about evolution, one of the most important aspects of science, as they would or...

You suggested evolution was not important. It is one of the most essential elements in the knowledge and understanding of science. You suggest not bothering with such science to give priority to other things. So what do you mean if that is not removing evolution? Doing things like that, not...

In regards to you being in support of creationism, I did neither suggest nor insinuate anything of the kind. Perhaps you could be specific in where you think I did. In regard to your main point, my earlier remarks, to which you must be assuming for some reason I thought of you as supporting...

One of the most continuously and heavily researched scientific explanations for life on earth and you think it's a minor issue ? Rest assured the complacency you display for your kids education will be taken full advantage of by the rest of the developed world including China too. Failed...

The building blocks of life are observed emerging from inorganic matter. If the building blocks are considered to be life itself, then your suggestion is doomed. If the building blocks of life are themselves considered not life, the building blocks of life obviously become life which is...

Gabfly gave an erudite and more thorough explanation. His patience in doing so and you, admitting you were wrong, should perhaps be recognized too. For one thing, wouldn't you think it an obvious evolutionary divergence from the other great apes if nothing else? There is overwhelmingly...

Ok Mr Angry keep your wig on. Now you're just making yourself look more and more ridiculous. Gravity obviously exists... that's a start, but how do you prove it's gravity existing , and not pixies pushing down on things existing, or Intelligent Falling existing, so not a law, not a proof of...

Doesn't work. "We" can't reasonably redefine things into existence by simply replacing one name with another . If "we" can, then Gilbert is God+1 , Gibert is a 100% certainty, 'Gilbert is the Universe' .

Good, then science when taught properly is nothing to do with belief. Well done. You got there. You observe gravity, yet Trader666 says there are ONLY theories about it. You can observe the building blocks of life emerging from inorganic matter, but you say there are ONLY theories about...