Search results

Good people who do evil things... are not good people. Don't otherwise good people advocate religion and the fear implicit within it , because they are afraid.

yes, you got that wrong again. Calculated values of the constants are the science. The appearance that they have been finely-tuned is merely pure speculation. Furthermore, scientifically, multiverses are hypothesized not merely speculated. It doesn't matter how many times you and...

Hurling personal insult won't camouflage your display of ignorance.

The only fact is, you post links that show your own ridiculous remarks and ignorant mistakes. With the usual ugly picture of yourself in a dunces cap complete with those nasty teeth. You seem to think that is making some kind of an argument, by dodging criticism of your errors, and...

Apparently you still imagine linking to your own epic fail, "reexpressing a negative" lol, will somehow magic your ignorance away :D Perhaps you might like to try and explain how you are able to "reexpress things" which aren't even in the mathematical problem or the resolution of it...

Which you obviously can't comprehend is infinitely more than can be done speculating about an imaginary deity.

I said I know... you have no argument. You really don't need to keep proving it. At least in your ignorance that has been one proof you managed more than you imagined you could do with pseudo-math and a negative.

Again , so what? Seriously, what are you trying to suggest, as if I didn't know. Those excerpts from your Jewish MIT dude, demand scientific answers. They don't require pointless religious infantile assumptions of God'n'stuff in daft response.

So what? He goes on to explain "remarkable" is all down to the laws of physics. I repeat. Vast numbers of universes popping into and out of existence due only to the laws of physics within a historical universe such as this one, that can only exist if values fall within a range needed...

Already done on both counts. You took no notice before, why would you now. And for your information I don't debunk what Penrose says, I debunked what you groundlessly and ignorantly assert from what he says. What you are calling fine-tunings are not real, anymore than what you are calling...

You imagine I have something backward. You imagine mathematical proofs are other than what they are. You imagine logical unfalsifiability must be wrong. You imagine repeatedly linking to your own blinding errors somehow seems an intelligent thing to do. The only valid link in all this as far...

Every one of your claims purporting to be "the science" has been debunked. Every one. So what do you do? Ignore everything and repost your claims again and again, just like a retard would.

You're just the guy in a bar who can't understand anything being said to him, with no argument and no clue, constantly half cut, unable to respond sensibly , telling anyone who comes into ear shot...."Einstein got Relativity BACKWARDS".

I repeat there is no science when you keep pointlessly repeating there is . Claims by a bible thumper about what Stephen Weinberg is supposed to have said to him, has no value. That is exactly the kind of simple-minded deceit you like to peddle and troll about. Stephen Weinberg is...

you're foulmouthed you're a liar. It's not possible to lie about something not lied about. On the other hand , you have lied. Just as you have lied above. And you can't camouflage 'intelligent design' with 'design' . you're hopelessly confused The argument has not changed. You...

Nothing new then. No argument, so it's ALL down to ad hom with you. From proving a negative to dark matter, not one valid argument have you carried through past infantile comment and false assertion. A definate pattern with you religious freaks.

Telling me to read the paper and put it into context is no answer as to why you evidently haven’t read the paper and keep taking it out of context. You don't even realize how absurd you are, do you? This is like the times I had to tell you over and over and over, not to spell cite as site...

Yeah well, now you're once again merely displaying your true level of intelligence. L@@k...Bollocks to your silly comparisons with "¬" "P" and "¬P" solutions. THE mathematical solution to square a circle IS impossible = true. You are the one considering impossible = true as "proving a...